B Time & Speed of Light: Not a Universal Constant

Shubh Goel
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Assumption travelling at speed of light is possible.
1. We are in empty space. I am travelling backwards(I am facing the direction opposite to my direction of motion) at half the speed of light. My other friend is travelling in opposite direction with the same speed being backward. If i look in the direction of my friend, i will see him getting slower and slower as we move apart even though relative velocity between us is still the same.
Time as we perceive is not a universal constant. It depends on the speed of the bodies and the distance between them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shubh Goel said:
Assumption traveling at speed of light is possible.
It isn't - it's prohibited by the postulates of relativity.
Shubh Goel said:
I am traveling backwards(I am facing the direction opposite to my direction of motion) at half the speed of light. My other friend is traveling in opposite direction with the same speed being backward.
Travelling at those speeds with respect to what? In what follows I'm assuming that you are specifying both speeds with respect to some common reference.
Shubh Goel said:
If i look in the direction of my friend, i will see him getting slower and slower as we move apart even though relative velocity between us is still the same.
No - you will always see him moving at constant velocity, 80% of the speed of light (in relativity velocities do not add the same way as they do in Newtonian physics). You will see his clocks ticking at a constant rate, albeit slower than your own.
Shubh Goel said:
Time as we perceive is not a universal constant. It depends on the speed of the bodies and the distance between them.
This depends a lot on what you mean by "time as we perceive it". Your own wristwatch, for example, will always tick at the same rate whatever your state of motion. Other people's watches may well tick at different rates as measured by you, but they would have the opposite opinion about whose watch is ticking normally and whose is ticking slowly.

Clock rates do not depend on distance, though. I suspect you have misunderstood something around the relativistic Doppler effect. It's fairly easy to show that you will see your friend's watch ticking at a constant rate of once every three seconds. The general formula for someone receding from you at speed ##v## is that their clock ticks once every $$\sqrt{\frac{c+v}{c-v}}$$seconds. If you correct for the increasing light travel time, you will calculate a tick rate of once every ##(1-v^2/c^2)^{-1/2}## seconds, which turns out to be once for every 1.67 ticks of your watch in your scenario. Neither of these formulae depend on the distance between you.
 
Last edited:
The OP is based on a misunderstanding of relativity, which has been explained. Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
74
Views
5K
Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
577
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top