Time to decelerate over a given distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter asp55
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
An object with an initial velocity of 95 m/s travels 8 km before stopping, prompting a discussion on how to calculate the time taken for this distance. The initial approach used an incorrect formula, leading to a negative time value, which raised concerns about the logic. The correct formula for distance, incorporating constant deceleration, was identified as Δx = v0t + (1/2)at², requiring a second equation to solve for both acceleration and time. After correcting the calculations and using the formula Vf² = Vo² + 2ad, the acceleration was found to be -0.564 m/s². Ultimately, the time taken to travel the distance was determined to be approximately 167 seconds.
asp55
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Alright, so the problem I'm working on is basically as such:

An object with an initial Velocity of 95m/s slides horizontally, constantly losing velocity. After traveling 8 km it comes to a stop.

How long did the object take to travel 8 km.

So here's how I went at it:

δx = v0 + .5at^2

δx+v0 = .5(δv/t)t^2

2(δx+v0) = v(t^2)/t

2(δx+v0)/δv = (t^2)/t

2(δx+v0)/δv = t

Then I plugged in:
δx = 8000m
v0 = 95m/s
δv = -95m/s

Which returned t = -170.421s (Which I thought was odd to begin with, as how can one have a negative value for time.)

But I tried plugging that into my initial equation to see that it all worked out but instead of getting δx = 8000m I got δx = 8190m

So obviously there is a flaw in my logic SOMEWHERE. I just don't know where.

Help please!?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You appear to be using a 'special character' that shows up on my reader as ? .
Was it δ ?

Your first error is not "logic" but the wrong formula: δ x= v0t+ (1/2)at2. You forgot the "t" multiplying v0.
Making that change, assuming that "constantly losing velocity" mean that the decelleration is constant, δx= v0t+ (1/2)at2. You are given that x= 8000 m and that v0= 95 m/s. That leaves a and t as unknowns. Since there are two unknowns, you need a second equation: in that same time, t, the velocity reduces from 95 to 0 so -95= at is the second equation.

You need to solve 8000= 95t+ (1/2)at2 and -95= at.

Substitute t= -95/a as you did and solve the quadratic equation.
 
Ahh, so I did. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
I used the formula

Vf^2 = Vo^2 +2ad
I found a from this. which was -0.564m/s^2

From there I went to the formula d= Vo+1/2at^2 and solved for time.
In which I got about 167 seconds.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top