Timelike Geodesic and Christoffel Symbols

wam_mi
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



How do I show the following metric have time-like geodesics, if \theta and R are constants

ds^{2} = R^{2} (-dt^{2} + (cosh(t))^{2} d\theta^{2})

Homework Equations



v^{a}v_{a} = -1 for time-like geodesic, where v^{a} is the tangent vector along the curve

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I write it as the Lagrangian

L = -R^{2}\dot{t}^{2} + (cosh(t))^{2} \dot{\theta}^{2} = -R^{2}\dot{t}^{2}

as \theta is a constant.

How do I proceed to show that this indeed gives us a time-like geodesic.

Could someone also tell me if I have computed the Christoffel symbol components correctly? My result is

\Gamma^{t}_{\theta \theta} = 0-sinh(t) \times cosh(t)

\Gamma^{\theta}_{t \theta} = tanh(t)

and all other components vanish.

Cheers!

P.S. How do I type minus sign? It doesn't seem to work if I have left the 0 out at above.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I'm not understanding the problem correctly, but if you're holding \theta constant, couldn't you just use d\theta = 0?
 
wam_mi said:
P.S. How do I type minus sign? It doesn't seem to work if I have left the 0 out at above.
\Gamma^{t}_{\theta \theta} = -sinh(t) \times cosh(t)
Works fine for me :confused:
Anyway, I get the same thing as you for the Christoffel symbols except without the minus sign. I could have made a mistake but you might want to recheck your calculations.
 
I don't see the need to compute the Christoffel coefficients at all. The solution to the Euler-Lagrange equations will be a geodesic, so if R and \theta are constants, you want to solve

\frac{\partial L}{\partial t}-\frac{d}{d\tau}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{t}}=0

(Where I'm using \tau to represent your affine parameter...i.e. \dot{t}=\frac{dt}{d\tau} )
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top