Tips on finding the eigenvalues of a 3x3 matrix

Click For Summary
Calculating the eigenvalues of a 3x3 matrix can be tedious, particularly when developing the characteristic polynomial, which results in a cubic equation. Using row operations on the matrix A - λI can simplify the process and yield the characteristic polynomial more efficiently. It's important to remember that the purpose of these exercises is to test understanding of eigenvalues rather than proficiency in solving cubic equations. Often, simple roots can be found by testing integers near zero, and in this case, -1 is identified as an eigenvalue. Overall, recognizing patterns and employing strategic techniques can significantly reduce the time spent on these calculations.
kamil
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I find it rather tedious to calculate the eigenvalues of a 3x3 matrix. For example
The \emph{characteristic polynomial} $\chi(\lambda)$ of the<br /> 3$3 \times 3$~matrix<br /> \[ \left( \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1 &amp; -1 &amp; -1 \\<br /> -1 &amp; 1 &amp; -1 \\<br /> -1 &amp; -1 &amp; 1 \end{array} \right)\] <br /> is given by the formula<br /> \[ \chi(\lambda) = \left| \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1-\lambda &amp; -1 &amp; -1 \\<br /> -1 &amp; 1-\lambda &amp; -1 \\<br /> -1 &amp; -1 &amp; 1-\lambda \end{array} \right|.\]

Now if I do this by develloping the minors I get a cubic equation and I can't solve it without at least 30 minutes. I find it time consuming, especially during an exam.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One tip is that row operations can help you solve for the characteristic polynomial. Remember, given the matrix A, however, perform row operations on the matrix A - \lambda I, and not just A in order for it to be valid.
 
The first thing to remember is that you got this question from a teacher or a book (possibly both) in all likelihood. They're not trying to make you really good at solving cubic equations (for which there is a formula by the way) or test your abilities to do something not particularly interesting like searching hard for solutions - they're testing that you understand what an eigenvalue is.

Thus one can deduce that there will almost always be simple roots of the equations in the examples they set you. Have you tried plugging in some integers near to zero to the characteristic polynomial? Just by looking at the matrix one can see that -1 is an eigenvalue (there is an obvious candidate for an eigenvector, the column vector of 1s, equivalently the sum of the entries in each row is -1).
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K