Tissue Engineering Problem - Find minimum starting cell population

AI Thread Summary
To create a tissue-engineered blood vessel using smooth muscle cells, a minimum starting cell population must be calculated based on exponential growth. Given that the cells double every 15 hours and at least 5 trillion cells are needed in four weeks, the necessary starting population can be determined using the formula that accounts for halving the required amount for each 15-hour interval. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the definition of a trillion and emphasizes the importance of using scientific notation for clarity. Ultimately, the correct calculation involves multiplying the target cell count by (1/2) raised to the number of halving intervals over the four-week period. Accurate mathematical understanding is crucial for achieving the desired cell population.
bmed90
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




You want to create a tissue engineered blood vessel using smooth muscle cells. Your plan is to isolate smooth muscle cells from discarded human tissue obtained from heart surgery and grow them for a long time to create cells own ECM. Smooth muscle cells have enormous groth potential in culture and assume they have a doubling time of 15 hours. If you need at least 5 trillion cells to make the blood vessel in four weeks what minimum starting cell population would you need?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

\

I've tried several attempts and I don't think they are even worth posting. Cant seem to get reasonable answers.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is about exponential growth. It will be probably easier to find information about exponential decay, but the math is the same, just works in a different direction.
 
Everyone should understand exponentials but this is a biologist in a hurry. :biggrin:

According to Wikipedia a trillion can mean either 1012 or 1018 which is not a negligible difference. So use scientific notation please.

The cell population doubles in 15 hours. So if it's a trillion (whatever that is) now, it was half a trillion 15 hours ago. It halves every 15h you go back in time. So how many halving times, how many 15 h are there in 4 weeks? So the number of cells you needed to start with is (a trillion) X (1/2)^ raised to the power of that number of halving times. In other words you multiply by a half for every 15 h.

What was unreasonable about the answers you got? Was it less than one? Doesn't mean the maths was wrong. What does it mean?
 
epenguin said:
Everyone should understand exponentials but this is a biologist in a hurry. :biggrin:

According to Wikipedia a trillion can mean either 1012 or 1018 which is not a negligible difference. So use scientific notation please.

The cell population doubles in 15 hours. So if it's a trillion (whatever that is) now, it was half a trillion 15 hours ago. It halves every 15h you go back in time. So how many halving times, how many 15 h are there in 4 weeks? So the number of cells you needed to start with is (a trillion) X (1/2)^ raised to the power of that number of halving times. In other words you multiply by a half for every 15 h.

What was unreasonable about the answers you got? Was it less than one? Doesn't mean the maths was wrong. What does it mean?

Well honestly I can tell you right now that whatever I got was wrong. I got like 5.6e11... So your saying the answer is 1e12(.5)^44
 
bmed90 said:
So your saying the answer is 1e12(.5)^44

44.8 to be precise.
 
bmed90 said:
Well honestly I can tell you right now that whatever I got was wrong. I got like 5.6e11... So your saying the answer is 1e12(.5)^44

Yes. Which is...?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top