Titration question 2 equivalence points. Am i right?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the molar mass of a weak acid from a titration problem, with a sample weighing 0.149 g requiring 16.80 mL of 0.110 M NaOH to reach the equivalence point, resulting in a calculated molar mass of 86.63 g/mol. Additionally, the pH of the weak acid is given as 4.34 after adding 8.40 mL of NaOH, leading to a query about the acid's dissociation constant (Ka). The participant recalls that at the half equivalence point, pH equals pKa, and calculates pKa as 10^-4.38, yielding a Ka of approximately 4.17 x 10^-5. The response affirms the correctness of the concept but suggests verifying the numerical values independently.
A_Munk3y
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Titration question 2! equivalence points. Am i right?

Homework Statement


this is the originial question.
A 0.149 g sample of a weak acid (HA) requires 16.80 mL of 0.110 M NaOH to completely reach the equivalence point. What is the Molar Mass of the acid?
and i got 86.63 g/mol. I have already made sure that it is right.

the question continues,
If the pH of the weak acid in question 1 (above) is 4,34 after 8.40 ml of the NaOH was added, what is the Ka of the acid?

Homework Equations



i think i remember this. At the half equivalence point, PH=PKa

The Attempt at a Solution



since PH=Pka at half equivalence point, the PH=10-4.38
giving me 4.17x10-5

am i right? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Your concept is correct. I did not examine your values, so just trust your concept and you may do your own rechecking of the values.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top