Titration Questions Homework: Dry/Wet Flasks, Stoppering Flasks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Badgeray
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Titration
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about titration homework, it is clarified that only flask #1 can be wet since it contains the unfiltered saturated Ca(OH)2 solution. Flask #2 must be stoppered to prevent contamination after filtration, which is crucial for accurate Ksp determination. The importance of ensuring that the final samples in flasks #3, #4, and #5 are saturated is emphasized, as their conditions directly impact the results. The necessity of dry flasks for certain transfers is highlighted to maintain solution integrity. Understanding the purpose of each flask is essential for successful titration calculations.
Badgeray
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A sample of saturated Ca(OH)2 solution in water is collected in flask #1, filtered into flask #2, then 25.00mL samples were transferred into flasks #3, #4, #5. Which flasks had to be dry and which could be wet?

Also, flask #2 was stoppered. Why?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I think only flask #1 could be wet since it is the only flask that has unfiltered solution.

I think flask #2 was stoppered since it was filtered to prevent contamination, but would it affect Ksp if it wasn't stoppered?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With no purpose stated I cannot see how it matters whether any flask is dry or wet.

Stoppering the bottle is to stop it something getting to it, what could that be?
 
The purpose was to determine the Ksp of calcium hydroxide using titration calculations
 
That's the general purpose of the whole process, but you have not stated purposes of individual transfers - and that's what matters.
 
Well we now know it is needed to know for sure that the solutions he gets at the end are exactly saturated. Not difficult to see what needs to be dry IMO.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top