To do with the Philosophy of Ethics

  • Thread starter Thread starter oranges and lemons
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ethics Philosophy
AI Thread Summary
Paternalism refers to the practice of governing or managing individuals in a fatherly manner, often by making decisions for them under the belief that it is in their best interest. This concept suggests that authorities, such as governments or employers, may intervene in personal matters to ensure individuals' well-being, even if it limits personal autonomy. The justification for paternalism lies in the idea that individuals may not always know what is best for themselves, necessitating guidance from those deemed more knowledgeable. The discussion highlights the ethical implications of this doctrine, particularly in the context of Glover's work "Causing and Death and Saving Lives." Understanding paternalism is crucial for evaluating the balance between individual freedom and the role of authority in personal decision-making.
oranges and lemons
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know what "Paternalism" mean? This concept was adressed in "Causing and Death and Saving Lives" by Glover. So does anyone know? Thanks in advance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pater means "father."


Main Entry: pa·ter·nal·ism
Pronunciation: -ªl.izðm
Function: noun
Inflected Form: -s

: the care or control of subordinates (as by a government or employer) in a fatherly manner; especially : the principles or practices of a government that undertakes to supply needs or regulate conduct of the governed in matters affecting them as individuals as well as in their relations to the state and to each other
 
Paternalism is basically the doctrine that "I know what's best for you." The justification is basically that sometimes people don't always know what is best for them, so someone who does should make sure that what is best for them actually occurs.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top