To find the amplitude of a mass on an elastic string

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the amplitude and time values for a mass on an elastic string undergoing simple harmonic motion (SHM). The user initially struggles with finding the correct time values when the mass reaches specific positions, particularly at points B and C. They realize that the phase angle needs adjustment to accurately reflect the mass's position and velocity at time t=0. Suggestions are made to reconsider the phase angle to ensure it aligns with the expected motion direction. Ultimately, the user acknowledges the need for a different phase angle to achieve the correct calculations and expresses gratitude for the assistance received.
gnits
Messages
137
Reaction score
46
Homework Statement
To find the amplitude of a mass oscillating on an elastic string
Relevant Equations
F=ma
Could I please ask for help with the following:

18.JPG


It's the final part I am having problems with.

So at this point we know we have SHM of amplitude (5/4)L

Now, using x = a cos(nt) ----- where we now know that n = sqrt(4g/L)

we can find the time at which x has any value.

So for exmaple, when x first equals (5/4)L we have:

(5/4)L = (5/4)L * cos( sqrt(4g/L) t ) which leads to t = 0, as expected.

Now, to find when x first arrives at C is to find when x first has a value of -(5/4)L giving:

-(5/4)L = (5/4)L * cos( sqrt(4g/L) * t1 ) which leads to:

t1 = (PI/4)*sqrt(L/g)

Similarly, to find when x first equals L/4 (i.e. when the mass is first at B) we can use:

L/4 = (5/4)L * cos( sqrt(4g/L) * t2) which leads to:

t2 = sqrt(L/g) * arccos(1/5)

and so time taken to move from B to C is:

t1 - t2 = (1/2) * ((PI/2) - arccos(1/5)) * sqrt(L/g)

which is not quite the desired answer.

Thanks for any help,
Mitch.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At ##t =0## the mass is at ##B##, which is not at an amplitude of ##5l/4##. I think you have to calculate where in the SHM cycle the motion starts.

Hint: you should be looking at motion of the form ##A\sin(\omega t + \phi)##.
 
Last edited:
PS I just checked through this and get the book answer.
 
Thanks for your suggestion, that really helped. So I've almost get there but I have sign out, can you spot my error?

So I use ##x=A\sin(\omega t + \phi)##

And we have that ##A=\frac{5l}{4}## and ##\omega=\sqrt{\frac{4g}{l}}##

In order to have ##x=\frac{l}{4}## when t = 0 we need to have ##\phi=arcsin(\frac{1}{5})##

So to find time to C we need to solve:

##sin(\sqrt{\frac{4g}{l}}t+arcsin(\frac{1}{5}))=1##

which leads to:

##t=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{\pi}{2}-arcsin(\frac{1}{5}))*\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}##

and I have a minus instead of a plus. Thanks for any help.
 
If ##x(0) = \frac l 4##, then what is ##x## when the mass is at ##C##?

In fact, perhaps think more carefully about taking ##x(0) = \frac l 4## in the first place!
 
I see, at C, ##x=-\frac{5l}{4}## (I had not used the negative)

This would lead to:

##sin(\sqrt{\frac{4g}{l}}t+arcsin(\frac{1}{5}))=-1##

and so

##\sqrt{\frac{4g}{l}}t+arcsin(\frac{1}{5})=-\frac{\pi}{2}##

and so:

##t=\frac{1}{2}(-\frac{\pi}{2}-arcsin(\frac{1}{5}))*\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}##

Sorry if I'm missing something obvious, but I'm still off.
 
gnits said:
I see, at C, ##x=-\frac{5l}{4}## (I had not used the negative)

This would lead to:

##sin(\sqrt{\frac{4g}{l}}t+arcsin(\frac{1}{5}))=-1##

and so

##\sqrt{\frac{4g}{l}}t+arcsin(\frac{1}{5})=-\frac{\pi}{2}##

and so:

##t=\frac{1}{2}(-\frac{\pi}{2}-arcsin(\frac{1}{5}))*\sqrt{\frac{l}{g}}##

Sorry if I'm missing something obvious, but I'm still off.

##x(0) = \frac l 4## doesn't fit with taking the ##\phi## you got. If you differentiate your equation you find that the mass is moving away from equilibrium at ##t =0##.

You could fix this by taking a different ##\phi## - note that more than one ##\phi## gives the same value of the trig functions. In any case, you need a different ##\phi## to get the correct position and velocity for the motion at ##t = 0##.

Taking ##x(0) = -\frac l 4## and ##C## as ##+\frac{5l}{4}## is perhaps the simplest approach.
 
OK, that's very helpful indeed. I had not been looking at the direction of the velocity. Thanks very much for all your help. I'll work through it all agian to be sure to understand it fully.
 
Back
Top