To prove the "##m^{\text{th}}## Powers Theorem"

  • Thread starter Thread starter brotherbobby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the "mth Powers Theorem," which involves verifying an identity for specific values of m, n, and a set of a_i's. The participants tested the theorem for m=0.5 and m=2, observing that the left-hand side (L.H.S.) and right-hand side (R.H.S.) of the equation yield different results, suggesting the theorem's validity is uncertain. The conversation also touches on the implications of m being less than zero and proposes using induction on n as a potential method for proving the identities. Additionally, the concept of convexity and concavity related to x^m is mentioned, along with a reference to Jensen's inequality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical inequalities, specifically Jensen's inequality.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of convex and concave functions.
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical induction techniques.
  • Ability to manipulate and evaluate expressions involving powers and roots.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the proof of Jensen's inequality and its applications in inequalities.
  • Study mathematical induction methods, particularly in the context of proving identities.
  • Explore the properties of convex and concave functions in greater detail.
  • Investigate the implications of the mth Powers Theorem for various ranges of m.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying advanced calculus or real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of inequalities and theorems related to powers and roots.

brotherbobby
Messages
756
Reaction score
170
Homework Statement
My textbook has listed the following theorem, calling it the "##m^{\text{th}}## Powers Theorem".

If ##a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n## be a set of positive numbers not all equal, then
1. $$\boxed{\frac{\left( \sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i^m \right)}{n} < \left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i}{n}\right)^m}$$, when ##0<m<1##
2. $$\boxed{\frac{\left( \sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i^m \right)}{n} > \left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i}{n}\right)^m}$$ when ##m\in \mathbb{R}-(0,1)##
Relevant Equations
I am not sure what the relevant equations to prove the above identities are
1695532956927.png
Statement :
Let me copy and paste the statement as it appears in the text on the right.

Attempt : I could attempt nothing to prove the identity. The best I could do was to verify it for a given value of the ##a's, m, n##. I am not even sure what this identity is called but I will take the author's word for it - "The mth Powers Theorem".

Verify :

(1)
Let some ##m=0.5 (<1)##, ##n=3## and ##a_i's = \{2,3,4\}##. Then the L.H.S. = ##\frac{\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{4}}{3}## = 1.72. The R.H.S. = ##\left( \frac {2+3+4}{3} \right)^{0.5}## = 1.73. Hence we see that L.H.S < R.H.S.

(2) Let some ##m=2 (>1)##, ##n=3## and ##a_i's = \{2,3,4\}##. Then the L.H.S. =## \frac{2^2+3^2+4^2}{3}## = 9.67. The R.H.S. = ##\left( \frac {2+3+4}{3} \right)^2## = 9. Hence we see that L.H.S > R.H.S.

So the theorem is probably true but we can't be sure.

1695534146367.png
Moreover, let's see on the last line for the stipulation for ##m## which I copy and paste to the right.
This implies that ##m<0##, say ##m= - 0.5##. I haven't verified this case but let's assume that the theorem holds for it.

Request : A hint or help to help prove these two identities would be welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about induction on ##n##?
 
Thank you. Let me try.
 
The idea is that ##x^m## is convex and concave for the corresponding values of ##m##. If you draw the graph you can see why it holds. These type of inequalities go by the name Jensen's inequality. The wiki article on it is not bad.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
2K