To prove the "##m^{\text{th}}## Powers Theorem"

  • Thread starter Thread starter brotherbobby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Theorem
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the "mth Powers Theorem," which involves verifying an identity related to powers of numbers. The original poster presents attempts to validate the theorem for specific values of m and n, expressing uncertainty about its validity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to verify the theorem for different values of m and n, questioning the identity's validity based on their calculations. One participant suggests using induction on n as a potential approach. Another participant introduces the concept of convexity and references Jensen's inequality as a related idea.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to understand the theorem. Some guidance has been offered, such as considering induction and the properties of convex functions, but no consensus or definitive direction has emerged yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes uncertainty regarding the identity's name and stipulations for m, including cases where m is less than or equal to zero, which have not been verified.

brotherbobby
Messages
766
Reaction score
171
Homework Statement
My textbook has listed the following theorem, calling it the "##m^{\text{th}}## Powers Theorem".

If ##a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n## be a set of positive numbers not all equal, then
1. $$\boxed{\frac{\left( \sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i^m \right)}{n} < \left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i}{n}\right)^m}$$, when ##0<m<1##
2. $$\boxed{\frac{\left( \sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i^m \right)}{n} > \left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i}{n}\right)^m}$$ when ##m\in \mathbb{R}-(0,1)##
Relevant Equations
I am not sure what the relevant equations to prove the above identities are
1695532956927.png
Statement :
Let me copy and paste the statement as it appears in the text on the right.

Attempt : I could attempt nothing to prove the identity. The best I could do was to verify it for a given value of the ##a's, m, n##. I am not even sure what this identity is called but I will take the author's word for it - "The mth Powers Theorem".

Verify :

(1)
Let some ##m=0.5 (<1)##, ##n=3## and ##a_i's = \{2,3,4\}##. Then the L.H.S. = ##\frac{\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{4}}{3}## = 1.72. The R.H.S. = ##\left( \frac {2+3+4}{3} \right)^{0.5}## = 1.73. Hence we see that L.H.S < R.H.S.

(2) Let some ##m=2 (>1)##, ##n=3## and ##a_i's = \{2,3,4\}##. Then the L.H.S. =## \frac{2^2+3^2+4^2}{3}## = 9.67. The R.H.S. = ##\left( \frac {2+3+4}{3} \right)^2## = 9. Hence we see that L.H.S > R.H.S.

So the theorem is probably true but we can't be sure.

1695534146367.png
Moreover, let's see on the last line for the stipulation for ##m## which I copy and paste to the right.
This implies that ##m<0##, say ##m= - 0.5##. I haven't verified this case but let's assume that the theorem holds for it.

Request : A hint or help to help prove these two identities would be welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about induction on ##n##?
 
Thank you. Let me try.
 
The idea is that ##x^m## is convex and concave for the corresponding values of ##m##. If you draw the graph you can see why it holds. These type of inequalities go by the name Jensen's inequality. The wiki article on it is not bad.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K