B To show of 5[SUP]√2 [SUP] >7, logically.

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter ssd
  • Start date Start date
ssd
Messages
268
Reaction score
6
Stuck at the simple looking homework problem of my student:
To show 5√2 >7, logically.
 
  • Like
Likes DuckAmuck
Physics news on Phys.org
Its ##5^{\sqrt2}>5^{1.4}##.

Now I suppose you aren't allowed to calculate powers other than integer powers, so you ll have to calculate 5^1.4 using the generalized binomial expansion ##(1+4)^{1.4}##. The first few terms up to 4^3 would be enough to show that ##5^{1.4}>7##.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem#Generalisations
 
Last edited:
Delta² said:
Its ##5^{\sqrt2}>5^{1.4}##.

Now I suppose you aren't allowed to calculate powers other than integer powers, so you ll have to calculate 5^1.4 using the generalized binomial expansion ##(1+4)^{1.4}##. The first few terms up to 4^3 would be enough to show that ##5^{1.4}>7##.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem#Generalisations

No need for that. If you want to prove ##5^{1.4} > 7##, then this is equivalent to proving ##(5^{14/10})^{10} > 7^{10}##. This should land you in the realm on the integers.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Thanks for your response. So, we can start with 2>1.96 and calculate 514 and 710. But this is not the answer I was looking for. Actually this can be done using standard inequalities (it's my guess only).
 
ssd said:
Thanks for your response. So, we can start with 2>1.96 and calculate 514 and 710. But this is not the answer I was looking for. Actually this can be done using standard inequalities (it's my guess only).
How about letting L = log base 2 and noticing:
L5√2 = √2L5 > 1.4L5 = 4(L5)/10 + L5 = (L54)/10 + L5 > .9 + L5 > ½ + L5 > L(1.4) + L5 = L(1.4•5) = L7.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top