I Tone vs hole size & spacing in a short tube

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter JT Smith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hole Short Tube
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between tone production and the physical characteristics of a bottomless espresso portafilter. A user discovered that blowing into the portafilter generated a tone at just over 3000Hz, prompting questions about how hole size and spacing might affect this. It was clarified that the fundamental frequency is primarily determined by the length of the tube, rather than the diameter or hole characteristics. The conversation also touched on the complexities of sound production in relation to fluid dynamics, especially when comparing it to instruments like flutes and teapots. Ultimately, the inquiry was driven by curiosity rather than practical implications for espresso making.
JT Smith
Messages
461
Reaction score
632
TL;DR Summary
tone produced by blowing into a cylindrical tube with small, regularly spaced holes at one end
While trying to dislodge some stubborn coffee debris in the holes of a wet espresso bottomless portafilter by blowing into it I discovered that it produced a tone at just over 3000Hz, with harmonics. I wondered, is there some way to use that to determine something about the hole size and spacing? Or is it more complicated than that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JT Smith said:
Or is it more complicated than that?

I guess so! :-)
 
The fundamental frequency generated by a tube depends on the tube length via a very simple equation. However before going into details are you sure the portafilter can be treated as a tube? It looks more like a membrane? Where exactly are you blowing from?
 
I'm blowing from the top. The "tube" is about 6cm long. Diameter at the top, where it's open, is about 6cm. It's cylindrical but then tapers over the last 1.5cm near the bottom to 4.5cm in diameter. There are at least 150 holes spaced evenly about 2mm apart. I think the holes are about 0.25mm in diameter. It doesn't produce a tone when it's dry.
 
That's the theory you need: https://www.compadre.org/osp/EJSS/4492/277.htm
(Both ends open part)

Diameter doesn't matter. the one and the only one crucial thing to know is the length. You say "about 6 cm" for that. The formula gives "about 2800 Hz" in that case which is near to your 3000. Since you say it is "just over" 3000 I bet the length is "just below" 5.6 cm. I mean that is the part that resonates. Small holes and other stuff are irrelevant.

(Since it seems it is both ends open you will hear all the harmonics. If one end was closed you would hear 1500 Hz and only the odd harmonics)
 
JT Smith said:
It doesn't produce a tone when it's dry.

That also makes sense. I play traditional reed flute, when you wet it much easier to play...
 
Okay, thank you for the explanation. I know about standing waves in a tube but thought this was a different problem related to the holes, maybe akin to the whistle on a teapot. I was hoping it would be a clever way to measure the hole size. The actual working length is probably affected by my mouth/lips being inserted into the top to form a seal.

Thanks again.
 
JT Smith said:
maybe akin to the whistle on a teapot

Well that is really a complicated domain: :smile:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_of_whistles

When practicing the reed flute first time and trying to make a proper sound; the first thing we were trying was to avoid "whistling" which is always a risk for a beginner. Distinguishing it from the proper tone is important.

Completely different physics there, it involves fluid dynamics not standing waves.
 
Yes, I'd looked at some of that prior to posting and realized it was too complicated for me to parse. Hence my question on this forum. Fortunately none of this matters when it comes to making espresso. I was just curious.
 
Back
Top