TOOLS? For measuring surface friction?

AI Thread Summary
Various tools exist for measuring surface friction, including the incline plane method, which determines the coefficient of friction based on the critical angle at which an object begins to slide. However, measuring friction on large, flat surfaces like a 20-foot section of ice presents challenges, particularly when an incline cannot be used. The primary concern is whether the friction remains consistent across the entire surface area of the ice. Alternative methods or tools may be necessary to accurately assess friction in such contained environments. Reliable measurement of surface friction is crucial for applications involving safety and performance on ice.
ko_kidd
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
TOOLS? For measuring surface friction?

Are there any good tools out there for measuring the friction of a surface such as a road or ice or other surfaces?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There is a simple way to measure friction using an incline plane. To find a critical angle adjust the angle of the plane until an object starts to slide. The coefficient of friction between the object and the inclined plane would proportional to a trig function of the critical angle.
 


What if I can't put ice on an incline?

I'm talking over 20 feet of ice, in a contained space. I think the main issue would be to see if the ice maintains relatively the same friction.

Because of the size of the container and the amount of ice I doubt I could place it on an incline.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top