Topology- Hyperplane proof don't understand

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Topology
zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let \mathbf {a} \in R^n be a non zero vector, and define {S = \mathbf {x} \in R^n : \mathbf {a} \cdot \mathbf {x} = 0 }. Prove that S interior = {\o}


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Intuitively I understand that if a is a vector in R^3, S would be a plane. And if I place an open ball on any point on the plane it would include points that are not on the plane. So S interior would be empty.

But I'm not sure how to prove this rigorously?
I'm supposed to somehow use the hint that a hyperplane in R^n will have 1 dimension less than R^n (like the plane in R^3 has 2 dimensions)
But I am confused about the dimension of the plane? All vectors on a plane in R^3 will have 1 (the same) component = 0? So does this mean that the dimension of the plane is 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can I just show that there is a point in the ball that has n components ?
Instead of n-1
 
zeion said:
Can I just show that there is a point in the ball that has n components ?
Instead of n-1

If a.x=0 you can pretty easily find a point y in any ball around x such that a.y is not zero.
 
I'm a little confused about that.
Do I need to differentiate between a point and a vector?
Like if I show that there are points in the ball that are not on the plane, then do I need to specify that the vector corresponding to that point is not perp a ?
 
zeion said:
I'm a little confused about that.
Do I need to differentiate between a point and a vector?
Like if I show that there are points in the ball that are not on the plane, then do I need to specify that the vector corresponding to that point is not perp a ?

Now I'm confused about that. Any point y in the ball around x of radius r is given by y=x+a where 'a' is any vector whose length is less than r. An awful lot of them don't satisfy a.y=0. Can you find just one?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top