I Toponium Discovered

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ohwilleke
  • Start date Start date
ohwilleke
Gold Member
Messages
2,647
Reaction score
1,605
TL;DR Summary
CMS in a paper published on August 23, 2025, and ATLAS in a paper that will imminently be published, have discovered a meson that is a bound state of a valance top quark and a valence antitop quark.
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark.

Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true.

But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that a top quark and a top anti-quark are created at the same time and both last much longer than the average lifetime before decaying, they can form a hadron which is called toponium, and it is fairly elementary to determine how likely this is to happen at a given energy scale.

In the paper below, the CMS collaboration at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) claims to have discovered a resonance which appears to be ground state toponium, which has a highly distinctive signature in a collider, because toponium is profoundly more massive (at more than 344 GeV) than any other meson. The background that has to be distinguished from the signal is therefore pretty modest.

Another paper, whose preprint was released today, in the course of considering the possibility of a hadron which is a baryon with three top quarks (a profoundly more difficult to form hadron since three top quarks or three antitop quarks need to be formed within about 3 x 10-25 seconds in essentially the same place), asserts that the ATLAS collaboration at the LHC has also discovered a toponium resonance, although the citation in the preprint does not include any arXiv or journal reference. This citation is to:

ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a cross-section enhancement near the t¯t production threshold in √s =13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector.”
Presumably the authors have received advance word of this paper from someone in the ATLAS collaboration (or are members of the collaboration themselves) and plan to update the reference in their own paper when it is released. Their paper slightly overstates what the papers actually claim (which is that the resonance is consistent with toponium, but not that it definitely is toponium), but only modestly so.

Discovering this vanishingly rare and incredibly short lived meson, which is the heaviest possible meson (and has a mass about 70% greater than a uranium-235 atom confined to a space on the order of 1000 times smaller than a proton) is a remarkable accomplishment in and of itself, and also with more detections, could make it possible to measure the top quark mass to a precision of about ten times as great as current measurements (from ± 0.3 GeV currently to ± 0.03 GeV).

A search for resonances in top quark pair (tt¯) production in final states with two charged leptons and multiple jets is presented, based on proton-proton collision data collected by the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC at s√ = 13 TeV, corresponding to 138 fb−1. The analysis explores the invariant mass of the tt¯ system and two angular observables that provide direct access to the correlation of top quark and antiquark spins. A significant excess of events is observed near the kinematic tt¯ threshold compared to the nonresonant production predicted by fixed-order perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD). The observed enhancement is consistent with the production of a color-singlet pseudoscalar (1S[1]0) quasi-bound toponium state, as predicted by nonrelativistic quantum chromodynamics. Using a simplified model for 1S[1]0 toponium, the cross section of the excess above the pQCD prediction is measured to be 8.8 +1.2−1.4 pb.
CMS Collaboration, "Observation of a pseudoscalar excess at the top quark pair production threshold" arXiv:2503.22382v2 (March 28, 2025, published version released on August 23, 2025).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Greg Bernhardt and sbrothy
Physics news on Phys.org
I may be too quick to like this as it's based on preprints, right? Also I'm not a real physicist, but it sure sounds exciting.
 
sbrothy said:
I may be too quick to like this as it's based on preprints, right? Also I'm not a real physicist, but it sure sounds exciting.
The CMS paper was published last week, with some modest revisions from the original preprint in March. If I were to hazard a guess, I'd guess that the ATLAS paper will be published more or less simultaneously with the release of its preprint in the very near future.

As far as "exciting" goes, on one hand, it is something that was possible to predict from shortly after the time that the top quark was discovered in 1995 at Fermilab, thirty years ago. So, it isn't all that surprising. On the other hand, it is an incredible technical achievement and if you'd asked me last Christmas when I though it would be achieved, I would have told you "probably sometime around 2035" at a next generation collider.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, as usual I was too fast. Coming from the CMS and ATLAS collaborationS I think it's a foregone conclusion that it will hold up.
 
Internal reviews in the big collaborations are far more stringent than the official peer review process. I have never heard of a paper that would have been rejected for having problems in its science content. Some get rejected because the reviewers think it's not notable enough for that journal, or because reviewers and authors can't agree on how to present things in a clear way.

Money plot from the paper:
1756446118962.webp


Only up to 8% difference, but nicely fitting to the expected distribution.
 
That’s actually not surprising when you look at the number of authors on their papers. I think I mentioned this elsewhere.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Back
Top