Tornados & Magnetism: Effects on Magnetic Properties

  • Thread starter Zokes
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Magnetism
In summary: There is published litterature on the subject, but I was not able to find a reference that specifically addressed the effects of tornadoes on magnetic properties. There may be some connection between the rotation of Earth and the effects of tornadoes on magnetic properties, as the magnetic field created by a tornado would be affected by the rotation of the Earth. However, this is more connected to the physics of tornadoes than to the effects of tornadoes on magnetic properties themselves. Most tornadoes do not emit EMP (electromagnetic pulse), but some do. EMP could potentially disrupt electronic equipment.
  • #1
Zokes
1
0
I was wondering if someone knows how nature tornados affect different materials magnetic properties? Is there any published litterature on this subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why would a tornado have any effects on magnetic properties?
 
  • #3
Maybe the corelius? effect have something to do with it. However that's more connected to the rotation of Earth i think. But does tornados emit EMP or smth that can distrub electronic equipments?
 
  • #4
When a charged particle (or a bunch of them) move in a circle, it creates a magnetic field that runs through the center of the circle. It points in the direction that your thumb would point if you curled the fingers on your right hand in the direction that the charges are rotating.

The sorts of things that generally end up being flung around in circles by tornadoes (rain droplets, ice particles, cows) tend to be neutral, and so they wouldn't create a B-field (magnetic field.) But if they somehow managed to get charged, the way that the water droplets in clouds do to form lightning, then I suppose that the tornado would create a B-field.

Here's a VERY crude estimate of the strength of B-field that the perfect tornado might create.

A lightning bolt contains 10 Coulombs of electric charge. (All of these numbers come from web pages googled at random and taken out of context.)

The mass of a cloud is 4 million kilograms (based on a density distribution of 0.1 g/m^3 to 5 g/m^3, and a cloud radius of one kilometer.) So the charge to mass ratio of charged water droplets is on the order of 2.5E-6 Coulombs per kilogram.

I found that wind speeds in tornados can exceed 200 mph, let's use 100 mph or 44 m/s. They can have a (funnel) diameter of 20 to 100 meters, I'll take the low end at 20 m.

The volume of a tornado must be a lot more dense than the 5 g per cubic meter of a rain cloud. But I'm going to multiply the mass by the charge to mass ratio, and I don't want to include the masses of all of the big fat raindrops and cows and other things that couldn't be charged to the same degree that clouds are. So I'll just use 5 g/m^3 for that purpose.

A cylinder of 40 meters in radius and 100 m in height could hold 2500 kilograms of water droplets, which could support a charge of 0.00628 Coulombs. Suppose, for simplicity, that the tornado makes all of this charge rotate around its center at a speed of 40 m/s and a radius of 20 m. This corresponds to a current of 0.002 Amperes.

The magnetic field at the center of the tornado is given by the Biot-Savart Law, and once you get rid of that danged integral, it says

B = ('mu-naught')*I / (2 * R)

where I is the current and R is the radius of 20 meters. mu-naught is (4*pi)*10^-7 and I forget the units.

So the mag field would have a strength of 6.28 * 10 -11 Teslas.

Compare this to the mag field of the earth, which is about 50E-6 Teslas at the Earth's surface. So the strength of the tornado's B-field is about one-millionth the strength of the Earth's B-field.

You may argue that my estimate has no validity at all, since it is based on so many unjustified guesses, estimates, and simplifications.

I hold that whereas one estimate may lead you to the wrong answer, several estimates will generally not affect your answer that much: as many of them will be overestimates as underestimates, and so your final answer will be pretty close to the actual value.

P
 

1. What is the connection between tornados and magnetism?

Tornados and magnetism are both examples of natural phenomena. While tornados are powerful storms that form from rotating air, magnetism is a force that can attract or repel objects. However, scientists have found that tornados can actually affect magnetic properties in some materials.

2. How do tornados affect magnetic properties?

When a tornado passes through an area, it creates intense winds that can generate an electric current. This current can then induce a magnetic field in nearby materials, causing changes in their magnetic properties. This process is known as a magneto-hydrodynamic effect.

3. Can tornados create permanent changes in magnetic properties?

While tornados can induce temporary changes in magnetic properties, they do not have a lasting impact. Once the tornado has passed and the electric current is no longer present, the magnetic properties of materials will return to their original state.

4. Are there any materials that are more susceptible to tornado-induced magnetic changes?

Yes, there are certain materials that are more sensitive to changes in magnetic fields. Some examples include iron, nickel, cobalt, and other ferromagnetic materials. These materials have a high magnetic permeability, meaning they can easily be influenced by external magnetic fields.

5. Is there any practical application for studying the effects of tornados on magnetic properties?

Studying the effects of tornados on magnetic properties can help us better understand the behavior of materials under extreme conditions. This knowledge can then be applied to various industries, such as construction and engineering, to create more resilient structures that can withstand tornado-force winds.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
736
Replies
1
Views
96
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
7
Views
960
Replies
4
Views
608
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
322
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
816
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
5
Views
334
Replies
1
Views
519
Replies
28
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
756
Back
Top