Torque Calculation without a gauge

AI Thread Summary
To measure shaft power of a vertical turbine using dead weight blocks, one can calculate torque by multiplying the dead weight by the length of the lever arm. A reaction turbine with a 6-inch diameter rotating at 2500 RPM generates 15 N.m of torque, but coupling it to a generator may reduce the RPM due to increased load. It's essential to understand that torque cannot be generated without load, and as load increases, torque typically increases while RPM decreases. A graph of Torque vs. RPM is recommended to find the peak power operating point. Alternative calculations suggest using the formula Power = pressure * flow rate for a more accurate assessment of available power.
dilipbhanu
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi
How can I measure, shaft power (watts or HP) of a vertical turbine using dead weight blocks

Turbine diameter - 18 inches
RPM - 450 ( Zero Load)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mount generator casing on bearings so it can rotate through a small angle.
Fix lever arm to generator casing.
Add rope from lever arm over pulley to dead weight.
Measure rpm an convert to angular velocity

Dead weight * length of lever arm = torque

Power = torque * angular velocity
 
  • Like
Likes billy_joule
Thanks a ton. A little more help.

My Turbine is a reaction turbine of 6 inch diameter. It rotates at 2500 RPM generating 15N.m of Torque. The mentioned RPM is measured for shaft rotating (without coupling it to any other machine). Once a Generator is coupled, what will be the final RPM. Will the RPM reduce ? If yes, is there a formula to calculate the final RPM ?
 
dilipbhanu said:
My Turbine is a reaction turbine of 6 inch diameter. It rotates at 2500 RPM generating 15N.m of Torque. The mentioned RPM is measured for shaft rotating (without coupling it to any other machine).

That statement is inconsistent. If there is no load on the turbine it cannot generate any torque (or power for that matter).

What usually/sometimes happens is that as you increase the load the torque increases and the rpm reduces. If you use the right units.. Power = Torque * rpm. So you really need a graph of Torque vs rpm to workout the best operating point (peak power) for the turbine.

Perhaps 2500rpm @ 15N.m is the max power operating point?
 
Last edited:
The RPM has been read with a non contact tachometer, while the Torque has been calculated theatrically based on the input forces (Water Pressure and Flowrate)

Motive fluid = Water
Pump Gauge Pressure = 29.86 PSI
Flow rate = Water leaving the turbine = 10LPS @ 19.70 m/s (linear Velocity)

Force = 10*19.697 = 196.95 Newtons
Turbine radius (arm length) = 3 inches ( 0.0762 meters)

Torque = 196.95*0.0762 = 15 N.m
Angular Velocity = 258.49 rad/sec
RPM = 2468

Power = Toque*rad/sec = 15*258.49 = 3877 Watts

Is my Torque calculation correct or have i missed something.
 
Perhaps I miss understand your calculation but force isn't mass * velocity.

It might be easier to use...

Power = pressure * flow rate

..to calculate the power available.

Which I make 2058 Watts.

If the turbine utput isn't connected to anything then this isn't the output power. It's the power needed to spin the turbine with no load. Eg its the power loss.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top