Torque calculations for logging winch

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding torque calculations in a hydraulic winch system. A hydraulic motor generates 3000 ft-lbs of torque at 650 RPM, and the torque remains constant regardless of the shaft diameter; however, the force exerted at the end of a lever arm changes with the radius. When connecting gears of different sizes, the torque at the shaft remains the same, but the pulling force varies based on the gear size and speed. The calculations illustrate that while torque is consistent, the force exerted by the gears changes, leading to confusion about how torque and force relate in practical applications. Ultimately, torque is a measure of rotational force at the shaft, while the force at the gear's edge is influenced by the gear's size.
  • #31
Yes. But put the crows foot at 90 degrees, and it stays the same. A U-joint will also seriously complicate the math.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Agreed :)
The U joint will change the torque sinusoidally from input to output as the joint rotates.
 
  • #33
Use 2 in line u-joints 90 degrees out of phase with each other. They will cancel each other out and give true torque. Lines of action must be parallel.
 
  • #34
Yes, just like the way they are designed in transport trucks.
The only reason why we are changing to CV joints for trucks (or trying to) is fatigue loads. Even though the input-output relation can be almost the same the intermediate shaft is subjected to repeated and reversed sinus inertial torque. This causes premature wear and eventual failure.
Anyways, this is way off topic LOL.

Cheers,
 
  • #35
I always wondered about drive shaft fatigue. I figured that they just threw enough material at it for infinite design life.
 
  • #36
Engineers try to design these components for infinite life, particularly when lives are involved. However, if we designed everything to last very long periods of time no one would need a new transportation vehicle in 50 years. This is bad for business. Moreover, the typical engineering approach to design such components is a nonlinear optimization problem. Optimizing performance, life, and cost all in one shot.
You could imagine over engineering a shaft so that it can handle 2000ft-lbs of torque for 20000 hours and use it on a device that only subjects it to 500 ft-lbs peak torque would affect the inertial performance of the device. All that extra mass can significantly affect the performance.

In short, we don't design things for infinite life most of the time. Just as long as possible given a certain cost and performance criterion.

Cheers,
 
  • #37
To add a bit to that. New engineering methods can reduce inertial affect and simultaneously increase its fatigue life. This however, is expensive to engineer and manufacture. Some of this involves composite materials and extensive finite element analysis and experimentation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K