Torque calculations for logging winch

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the calculations of torque and its implications in a logging winch system using a hydraulic motor generating 3000 ft-lbs of torque at 650 RPM. The participants clarify that while torque remains constant at the shaft, the pulling force varies with the diameter of the gear or pulley attached. Specifically, a 2" pulley reduces the torque to 1500 ft-lbs, while a 10" pulley increases the torque to 7500 ft-lbs, demonstrating the relationship between gear size and torque transmission. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding torque as a measure of force applied at a distance, rather than a direct correlation to gear size.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mechanical principles, specifically torque and force.
  • Familiarity with gear ratios and their impact on torque transmission.
  • Knowledge of hydraulic motors and their torque output specifications.
  • Ability to perform basic calculations involving torque, force, and distance.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque and its calculation using the formula T = F * r.
  • Learn about gear ratios and their effects on torque and speed in mechanical systems.
  • Explore hydraulic motor specifications and performance metrics, focusing on torque output.
  • Investigate the relationship between pulley sizes and their impact on load capacity and speed.
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, equipment designers, and anyone involved in the design and operation of hydraulic winch systems will benefit from this discussion. It provides insights into torque calculations and the practical implications of gear and pulley sizes in load management.

  • #31
Yes. But put the crows foot at 90 degrees, and it stays the same. A U-joint will also seriously complicate the math.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Agreed :)
The U joint will change the torque sinusoidally from input to output as the joint rotates.
 
  • #33
Use 2 in line u-joints 90 degrees out of phase with each other. They will cancel each other out and give true torque. Lines of action must be parallel.
 
  • #34
Yes, just like the way they are designed in transport trucks.
The only reason why we are changing to CV joints for trucks (or trying to) is fatigue loads. Even though the input-output relation can be almost the same the intermediate shaft is subjected to repeated and reversed sinus inertial torque. This causes premature wear and eventual failure.
Anyways, this is way off topic LOL.

Cheers,
 
  • #35
I always wondered about drive shaft fatigue. I figured that they just threw enough material at it for infinite design life.
 
  • #36
Engineers try to design these components for infinite life, particularly when lives are involved. However, if we designed everything to last very long periods of time no one would need a new transportation vehicle in 50 years. This is bad for business. Moreover, the typical engineering approach to design such components is a nonlinear optimization problem. Optimizing performance, life, and cost all in one shot.
You could imagine over engineering a shaft so that it can handle 2000ft-lbs of torque for 20000 hours and use it on a device that only subjects it to 500 ft-lbs peak torque would affect the inertial performance of the device. All that extra mass can significantly affect the performance.

In short, we don't design things for infinite life most of the time. Just as long as possible given a certain cost and performance criterion.

Cheers,
 
  • #37
To add a bit to that. New engineering methods can reduce inertial affect and simultaneously increase its fatigue life. This however, is expensive to engineer and manufacture. Some of this involves composite materials and extensive finite element analysis and experimentation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K