Torque (changing reference frames and adding)

AI Thread Summary
A homogeneous transformation matrix can change the coordinate system of torque vectors, but only the rotation component is used for transforming the torque vector itself; displacement is needed for the point of application. To add two torque vectors acting about different axes, simply sum them, but the net torque's point of application requires additional information about the forces generating those torques. Without knowing the force sums, the net torque around a third point cannot be determined. In cases where the forces sum to zero, the net torque can be calculated directly by adding the two torques, with the application point being arbitrary. Care must be taken when transforming torque vectors between right-hand and left-hand systems, as this requires negating the torque vector.
joaozinho
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello there

I have 2 questions:
1. Can one change the coordinate system of torque vectors through a homogeneous transformation matrix with both rotation and displacement?

2. What's the procedure to add two torque vectors about different axes?

Thanks in advance,
João
 
Physics news on Phys.org
joaozinho said:
1. Can one change the coordinate system of torque vectors through a homogeneous transformation matrix with both rotation and displacement?
Use just the rotation part to transform the torque vector. The full transformation with displacement must be applied to transform the point around which the torque acts.

joaozinho said:
2. What's the procedure to add two torque vectors about different axes?
The get the net torque acting on an object you just add them, regardless around which axis they act.
 
Thank you! That was a quick reply!
So if I add the two torque vectors, the result will be the net torque about what point?
 
joaozinho said:
So if I add the two torque vectors, the result will be the net torque about what point?
In general, if just know two torques acting around two different points, you cannot compute a net torque around some third point. You also have to know the force sums of the forces for each of those two torques. Then the total net torque around some third point is the sum of the two torques, plus the two torques from those force sums acting at the two different points.

In the special case, when each of the two torques is generated by a force set which sums to zero, you simply add the two torques. The point of application of that net torque is arbitrary.

Also a word of caution on your first question regarding transforming a torque vector to a different coordinate system via a matrix: If one is a right-hand-system and one a left-hand-system you have to apply the 3x3-matrix and negate the torque vector.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top