Torque & Normals: Why Do We Ignore Normals?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Offlinedoctor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torques
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the role of normal forces in torque calculations, specifically questioning why they are often overlooked. The key point is that torque is defined as the product of force and the distance from the pivot point, with only the tangential component of force contributing to torque. Normal forces, which act perpendicular to the moment arm, are only relevant when friction is present at the hinge. This clarification helps to demystify the application of torque in scenarios involving multiple forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly torque and force vectors.
  • Familiarity with the definition of torque and its mathematical formulation.
  • Knowledge of normal forces and their role in mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of friction and its effects on torque calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the mathematical definition of torque and its components.
  • Study the role of normal forces in mechanical systems, particularly in static equilibrium.
  • Explore the effects of friction on torque calculations in practical applications.
  • Investigate real-world examples of torque involving multiple forces, such as people on planks.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mechanical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of torque and force interactions in mechanical systems.

Offlinedoctor
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm struggling to understand why we never consider normals when doing torque questions?

One on the top of my head is a hand pushing a bar, 'x' metres away' from the pivot joint. From the worked examples, there is only one torque (the hand), but how come we never consider the normal forces involved? It gets more confusing when I think about applying torque to people on planks, how come when some people are standing we never take into account their normals when applying torque?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Offlinedoctor said:
Hi,

I'm struggling to understand why we never consider normals when doing torque questions?

Perhaps you should review the definition of torque:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque

One on the top of my head is a hand pushing a bar, 'x' metres away' from the pivot joint. From the worked examples, there is only one torque (the hand), but how come we never consider the normal forces involved? It gets more confusing when I think about applying torque to people on planks, how come when some people are standing we never take into account their normals when applying torque?

Which 'normal forces' are you talking about? The definition of torque explicitly deals with normal forces acting perpendicular to a moment arm.
 
If you have a force acting with both horizontal and vertical components, then the tangent component will be used to calculate the torque. The "normal" component is only used if you have friction at the hinge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K