Torque on a Rigid Body: Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter miss photon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Torque
AI Thread Summary
When the net force on a rigid body is zero, the torque about any line perpendicular to the plane of the forces is indeed equal, as long as the forces create a couple. This situation allows the body to rotate about its center of mass without affecting the torque's independence from the choice of origin. However, the angular momentum of the body is not uniform across all axes; it depends on both the angular momentum about the center of mass and the motion of the center of mass itself. Therefore, while torque can be consistent under specific conditions, angular momentum varies based on the chosen axis. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing rigid body dynamics effectively.
miss photon
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

is it true that when the net force on a rigid body is zero, the torque about any line perpendicular to the plane of the forces is equal?

it is known that angular velocity, and hence angular acceleration about any line is the same for a given rotating rigid body.
implies,\alpha is same about all lines.
\tau=I\alpha
if we accept the above statement to be true, then I comes out to be equal about every axis, which we know is not true. so what's the explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
miss photon said:
is it true that when the net force on a rigid body is zero, the torque about any line perpendicular to the plane of the forces is equal?

Perhaps I misunderstood something, but in general all the forces need not act in the same plane.
 
miss photon said:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

is it true that when the net force on a rigid body is zero, the torque about any line perpendicular to the plane of the forces is equal?

it is known that angular velocity, and hence angular acceleration about any line is the same for a given rotating rigid body.

When only two equal anti-parallel forces act on a body it’s called a couple. This just rotates the body about the CM in the plane containing those forces. The torque of these two forces is independent of the choice of origin, and the answer to your first Q is yes.

(But there need not be exactly two forces as long as the resultant force is zero. Then also, the net result is a couple.)

Your 2nd statement about ang mom is not true. The ang mom of a body around any axis is the sum of the ang mom of the body about the CM and the ang mom of the CM about that axis considering the whole mass to be residing in the CM.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top