Tossing a Coin 100 Times: Probability of All Heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter jk22
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Tossing a fair coin 100 times results in a probability of (1/2)^100 for obtaining all heads or any specific sequence. However, achieving 50 heads and 50 tails in any order has a higher probability due to the numerous combinations possible. The discussion highlights the confusion between the probability of specific sequences versus the overall outcomes. Longer runs of the same result are statistically less likely to occur, which can lead to misconceptions about their plausibility. Understanding the difference between specific sequences and general outcomes is crucial in probability analysis.
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
Suppose I toss a fair coin 100 times. If I consider the order of apparition, then obtaining all head, or fifty times head has the same probability, namely (1/2)^100 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22 said:
Suppose I toss a fair coin 100 times. If I consider the order of apparition, then obtaining all head, or fifty times head has the same probability, namely (1/2)^100 ?
How did you get that answer for the second case, getting 50 heads?
 
jk22 said:
Suppose I toss a fair coin 100 times. If I consider the order of apparition, then obtaining all head, or fifty times head has the same probability, namely (1/2)^100 ?
No, because there is only one way in which you can toss all heads, but there are many more ways in which you can obtain 50 heads in 100 tosses.
 
I'm considering one particular order hhhh...ttttt... fifty time each.
 
jk22 said:
I'm considering one particular order hhhh...ttttt... fifty time each.

Yep, in that case the probability is the same.
 
But, intuitively, it seems to me that the serie htht... were more plausible than hhhh...ttt... ?
 
jk22 said:
I'm considering one particular order hhhh...ttttt... fifty time each.
I'm a bit confused with your wording there, did you mean getting 50 consecutive heads followed by 50 consecutive tails and you want to know the chance of getting that particular order? If that's the case, it should be indeed (1/2)^100.
jk22 said:
But, intuitively, it seems to me that the serie htht... were more plausible than hhhh...ttt... ?
Then you may want to refine your intuition, getting one particular order is as hard as getting another different particular order.
 
  • Like
Likes S.G. Janssens
Yes. I think I'm mixing with the statistics of the length of runs. The probability to obtain k times the same is 1/2^(k+1) hence if i write a program computing that statistics I should obtain an exponential decaying curve.

But that's where my problem arises above, since run length that are longer have less chance to appear, I would expect the case hhhh...tttt... were less likely to appear.

I did a computer simulation of throwing 100 times a coin, and repeating 100'000 times the experiment, storing run length values :
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9pGxyM9yy2fYlpIV08wMF9jVk0/view?usp=sharing
 
Last edited:
jk22 said:
But that's where my problem arises above, since run length that are longer have less chance to appear, I would expect the case hhhh...tttt... were less likely to appear.
I think you may be confusing the statistics of run length and the maximum run length of a given outcome. On average, you will get many runs of length 1, but you have only one possibility (if you start by h) that the longest run is of length 1.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
57
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
7K
Replies
29
Views
4K
Back
Top