Total distance a car moves with two coefficients of friction?

AI Thread Summary
A 1000 kg car moving at 10 m/s begins to skid, with the first 4 m having a coefficient of friction of 0.35 and the remainder at 0.2. Initial calculations suggested a stopping distance of 9.27 m, but this was incorrect due to varying forces during the skid. A revised approach calculated the distance for the second part of the skid as 18.5 m, leading to a total estimated distance of 22.5 m. However, the provided answer choices indicate a possible error, with 18.4 m being the closest option. The discussion emphasizes the need to correctly account for both segments of the skid to determine the total distance accurately.
juicyfruit
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A 1000 kg car is moving at 10 m/s, the car applies the brakes and begins to skid and leave a mark. the first 4 m of the surface has a coefficient of 0.35 and after that the coefficient of friction is 0.2. What is the total distance the car will slide when coming to rest?


Equations: F=ma and F(f)=μN
Δχ=V0t + 1/2at2
Vf=V0 + at
W=Fxd
W=1/2mVF^2 - 1/2mV0^2


Since the car is going to rest, I'm going to assume the final velocity is 0. Since there are no other Y axis forces, I think you can assume N=mg so it equals 9800N. I tried using the F=ma of the x components and got -(9800*.35)+(9800+.2)=ma so the acceleration was -5.39 m/s^2 for the whole system. Plugged that into Vf=Vo+at to get 1.86 seconds and plugged both into the second equation to get 9.27m for ΔX.

That wasn't any of the possible answer choices, any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
juicyfruit said:
-(9800*.35)+(9800+.2)=ma

In this equation, what are the forces on the left side? Does this equation match the problem statement? (I assume you meant to write -(9800*.35)+(9800*.2)=ma instead of the +).

By the way, I recommend to derive the final expression of your solution before putting the numbers in. That way, it is easier to find your mistake.
 
So I took another shot at it, different approach, please correct me if I'm wrong. So since work is the change in potential energy, I think you can assume W=1/2mv^2. So W=sum of F*d in the system and I'm assuming the only forces are the frictional force since there's no external force pushing the car.

So Ff=9800(.35)(4)+9800(.2)d and that is equal to work
E=.5(1000)(10^2)
W=1/2mv0^2 since it comes to a stop? you can assume Vf=0 so you have just v0
1,960d+13,720=50,000
d=18.5m

If I made any wrong assumptions or any mistakes, please point them out. I appreciate any help or confirmations, thank you
 
juicyfruit said:
So I took another shot at it, different approach, please correct me if I'm wrong. So since work is the change in potential energy, I think you can assume W=1/2mv^2. So W=sum of F*d in the system and I'm assuming the only forces are the frictional force since there's no external force pushing the car.

So Ff=9800(.35)(4)+9800(.2)d and that is equal to work
E=.5(1000)(10^2)
W=1/2mv0^2 since it comes to a stop? you can assume Vf=0 so you have just v0
1,960d+13,720=50,000
d=18.5m

If I made any wrong assumptions or any mistakes, please point them out. I appreciate any help or confirmations, thank you
Your first method was wrong because forces and accelerations are different during each part of the slide. Your second approach is good but you calculated d for the 2nd part. Total stopping distance is ?
 
PhanthomJay said:
Your first method was wrong because forces and accelerations are different during each part of the slide. Your second approach is good but you calculated d for the 2nd part. Total stopping distance is ?

Would it just be 18.5+4? You add the distances together? Then you'd get 22.5m but the answer choices I have are:

3.5 m
24.8 m
8 m
18.4 m

Which is why I thought it had to be 18.4 since that was close to my first answer. I know it asks for total, so either it's a mistake on my part or the instructors.
 
juicyfruit said:
Would it just be 18.5+4? You add the distances together? Then you'd get 22.5m but the answer choices I have are:

3.5 m
24.8 m
8 m
18.4 m

Which is why I thought it had to be 18.4 since that was close to my first answer. I know it asks for total, so either it's a mistake on my part or the instructors.
looks like an answer key error. Clearly from your calc the distance d is the distance traveled overt the surface with the 0.2 friction coefficient. You've for to add that value to the first 4 m traveled to get the total distance of the slide.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top