Total Internal Reflection in Refraction Physics: Solving for Critical Angle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the critical angle for total internal reflection in a material with an index of refraction of 1.2, which is determined to be 56.44 degrees. Participants confirm that for total internal reflection to occur, the angle of incidence must be greater than this critical angle. Snell's Law is recommended as a useful tool for solving such problems. The consensus is that the angle beyond which total internal reflection occurs is indeed greater than 56.44 degrees. Overall, the critical angle is a key concept in understanding total internal reflection in refraction physics.
jsalapide
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
If the transparent material has an index of refraction of 1.2, what is the angle of incidence beyond which total internal reflection occurs?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I solved for the critical angle and I got 56.44 degrees,

Should the answer be "greater than 56.44 degrees" so that the total internal reflection may occur?
 


EDIT: this is in response to post #1.

You'll have to show some work on the problem before receiving help.

Snell's Law is helpful here. You could also review your textbook or lecture notes discussion of total internal reflection.
 
Last edited:


jsalapide said:
I solved for the critical angle and I got 56.44 degrees,
Correct :smile:

Should the answer be "greater than 56.44 degrees" so that the total internal reflection may occur?

Since they are asking for the angle beyond which total internal reflection occurs, the answer is simply 56 degrees.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Optics: refraction and reflection
Replies
1
Views
2K
The refractive index of an unknown liquid
Replies
1
Views
3K
Total Internal Reflection and Transmitted Wavelength
Replies
1
Views
795
When can internal reflection be used to find the index of refraction
Replies
4
Views
2K
Calculate a radius of a circle on a screen
Replies
3
Views
1K
What is the angle of incidence?
Replies
7
Views
2K
AP physics 2: Phase change in thin film interference
Replies
1
Views
750
B Shouldn't the refracted ray be along the boundary here?
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Outer layer refractive index - total internal refection on waveguide
Replies
2
Views
2K
How does the surface of a refracting prism become reflective?
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top