What is the Minimum Refractive Index for Total Internal Reflection?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The minimum refractive index for total internal reflection is established through Snell's Law, specifically when the incident angle is 60 degrees and the refracted angle is 90 degrees. The correct calculation shows that the refractive index of the first medium (n1) must be at least 1.15, contrary to the initial miscalculation of 2. The confusion arose from misunderstanding the angles of incidence and refraction, which are measured from the normal to the surface, not from the surface itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Snell's Law
  • Knowledge of angles of incidence and refraction
  • Familiarity with the concept of total internal reflection
  • Basic geometry related to triangles and angles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Snell's Law in optics
  • Explore the conditions for total internal reflection in different media
  • Learn about the critical angle and its significance in optics
  • Investigate practical applications of total internal reflection, such as fiber optics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of light behavior at interfaces between different media.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



See figure attached for problem statement.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Using Snell's Law,

n_{1}sin(\theta_{1}) = n_{2}sin(\theta_{2})

n_{1} = \frac{n_{2}sin(\theta_{2})}{sin(\theta_{1})}

Where,

\theta_{1} = 30^{o}, \theta_{2} = 90^{o}

It gives me, n_{1} = 2 but the answer is a minimum of 1.15.

What did I do wrong/misunderstand?
 

Attachments

  • CriticalAngleQ.JPG
    CriticalAngleQ.JPG
    27.6 KB · Views: 433
Physics news on Phys.org
hi jegues! :smile:

it's not 30°, it's 60° :redface:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi jegues! :smile:

it's not 30°, it's 60° :redface:

Yes I figured that much but I don't understand why.

I'm looking at the triangle and the angle at the bottom right should be 90-60 = 30, that's where the incident angle is isn't it?
 
hi jegues! :smile:
jegues said:
… the angle at the bottom right should be 90-60 = 30, that's where the incident angle is isn't it?

nooo :redface: … the angles of incidence and refraction are always from the normal :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi jegues! :smile:


nooo :redface: … the angles of incidence and refraction are always from the normal :wink:

So a line perpendicular to the surface it's hitting, right?
 
s'right! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
842
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K