Total Mechanical Energy & Escape Velocity: Explained

AI Thread Summary
Total mechanical energy must be zero for an object to achieve escape velocity because, at infinite distance from Earth, gravitational potential energy becomes zero. Since gravity is a conservative force, the total mechanical energy remains constant, and a positive total energy allows for escape, while negative energy prevents it. The escape velocity represents the minimum speed needed for an object to leave Earth's gravitational influence without falling back. This concept highlights the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in the context of gravitational fields. Understanding these principles is essential for studying motion in astrophysics and space exploration.
computerages
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I just had a question that why the total mechanical energy has to be zero in order for an object to achieve escape velocity?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically when we want a body to escape the gravitational field of earth, what we want is that it goes far away from the vicinity of earth. Far away from the earth, the gravitational potential energy is zero and because gravity is a conservative force the total mechanical energy is same throughout i.e. zero. Also note that this is a limiting case, even if the the total mechanical energy is positive the body will escape but it cannot escape the field if the total energy is negative.
 
Perhaps, it may be better to say that if we throw a body directly up, we don't want the body ever to fall back on earth. That minimum speed for that is the escape speed. The rest is as harshant said.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top