Trace of a subsystem of a two qubit system

Haorong Wu
Messages
417
Reaction score
90
Homework Statement
From Nielsen's QC&QI, in page 109 (The schmidt decomposition), it reads that:
As an example, consider the state of two qubits, ##\left( \left | 00 \right> +\left | 01 \right> +\left | 11 \right> \right) / \sqrt 3##. This has no obvious symmetry property, yet if you calculate ##tr \left ( {\left( \rho ^A \right )}^2 \right )## and ##tr \left ( {\left( \rho ^B \right )}^2 \right )## you will discover that they have the same value, ##\frac 7 9## in each case.
Relevant Equations
The density operator for a system is ## \rho \equiv \sum_i p_i \left |\psi _i \right> \left < \psi _i \right |##.
Also, ## tr \left( A \left | \psi \right > \left < \psi \right | \right) =\left < \psi \left |A \right | \psi \right > ##
Consider the first qubit (subsystem A):

First, the density operator for the system AB is ## \rho ^{AB} =\frac { \left |00 \right > \left <00 \right |+ \left |01 \right > \left < 01\right |+\left | 11\right > \left < 11\right | } 3 ##.

Then, the reduced density operator of subsystem A is ## \rho ^A = \frac { \left |0 \right > \left <0 \right |+ \left |0 \right > \left < 0\right |+\left | 1\right > \left < 1\right | } 3 =\frac { 2\left |0 \right > \left <0 \right |+\left | 1\right > \left < 1\right | } 3 ##.

Thus, ## \left ( \rho ^A \right ) ^2=\frac { 4\left |0 \right > \left <0 \right |+\left | 1\right > \left < 1\right | } 9##.

So, ## tr \left ( {\left( \rho ^A \right )}^2 \right ) =\frac 5 9##.

I overchecked the procedure several times, but I can't see where am I wrong.

Thanks for reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to think again about the result you got for ##\rho^{AB}##
 
cpt_carrot said:
You might want to think again about the result you got for ##\rho^{AB}##

Hi, cpt_carrot. I still can't figure the mistake.

Here is my reasoning:

There are three possible states : ## \left | 00 \right> , \left | 01 \right> , \left | 11 \right> ## all with probabilitities of ##\frac 1 3##.

So ##\rho \equiv \sum_i p_i \left | \psi _i \right > \left < \psi _i \right |=\frac { \left |00 \right > \left <00 \right |+ \left |01 \right > \left < 01\right |+\left | 11\right > \left < 11\right | } 3 ##.

Maybe I understand the definition of density operator in a wrong way.

Could you help me point the mistake? Thanks!
 
You need to include the cross terms in the outer product. The density matrix for your pure state ##|\psi\rangle## is ##\rho= |\psi\rangle\langle\psi|## which includes terms like ##|00\rangle\langle 01|##
 
  • Like
Likes Haorong Wu
cpt_carrot said:
You need to include the cross terms in the outer product. The density matrix for your pure state ##|\psi\rangle## is ##\rho= |\psi\rangle\langle\psi|## which includes terms like ##|00\rangle\langle 01|##
Oh, so ##
\rho \equiv \sum_i p_i \left | \psi _i \right > \left < \psi _i \right |## should be applied to a collect of pure states.
I am going to redo the calculation again.
Thanks, cpt_carrot!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top