Transactional Interpretation Absorber?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice809
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interpretation
ice809
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm just curious, but I've been reading about Transactional Interpretation For some time now and I know about the law of causality, Wave function collapse, etc. My question is How would I know when a Absorber (object) emits a Confirmation wave to my emitter (laser) which offers an offer wave? How would i be able to observe the absorbers wave? Please provide Good info and please no negative comments. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
transactional interpretation works on the principle of half advanced and half retarded wave.It was an unsuccessful attempt to resolve the infinities of classical electrodynamics in the hope that if classical electrodynamics will not contain infinity then it might be possible to avoid divergence in quantum electrodynamics.In this theory there is no self interaction of electrons and there is interaction with other electrons only.you can see here for details
http://authors.library.caltech.edu/11095/
 

Thread 'Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons'

I would like to know the validity of the following criticism of one of Zeilinger's latest papers https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07756 "violation of bell inequality with unentangled photons" The review is by Francis Villatoro, in Spanish, https://francis.naukas.com/2025/07/26/sin-entrelazamiento-no-se-pueden-incumplir-las-desigualdades-de-bell/ I will translate and summarize the criticism as follows: -It is true that a Bell inequality is violated, but not a CHSH inequality. The...
View full post »

Thread 'Question about discussions around quantum interpretations'

I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
View full post »

Thread 'Modern View of Quantum Phenomena'

This is not, strictly speaking, a discussion of interpretations per se. We often see discussions based on QM as it was understood during the early days and the famous Einstein-Bohr debates. The problem with this is that things in QM have advanced tremendously since then, and the 'weirdness' that puzzles those attempting to understand QM has changed. I recently came across a synopsis of these advances, allowing those interested in interpretational issues to understand the modern view...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Is the Transactional Interpretation deterministic?
Replies
15
Views
3K
I The TSVF interpretation of quantum mechanics
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Can I take the transactional interpretation seriously?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Are there any accepted relativistic interpretations of quantum mechanics?
Replies
45
Views
6K
I Universe thermodynamic equilibrium & Transactional Interpretation
Replies
10
Views
3K
I How To Experimentally Confirm the Wigner-Von Neumann Interpretation
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?
Replies
35
Views
492
A Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality
2
Replies
91
Views
4K
I Spooky action at a distance and various interpretations of QT
2
Replies
81
Views
7K
I Making the wave observable in the double-slit experiment
3
Replies
105
Views
8K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top