Engineering Transform question about this circuit

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a circuit problem involving Kirchhoff's voltage law and the complexities introduced by the output voltage (Vo) within the circuit. Participants suggest converting circuit components into impedances to simplify analysis in the s-domain. They emphasize the importance of correctly identifying current directions and relationships between components. A participant notes the transition from a four-loop to a three-loop circuit while working towards deriving the transfer function. The conversation concludes with advice on using voltage divider principles to determine Vo based on the voltages across resistors and capacitors.
Fuji
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Need to derive the transfer function
Relevant Equations
G(s)=Vo(s)/Vi(s)
F.JPG
I Normally can solve these but when Vo is embeded into the circuit, is throwing me for a loop (no pun is intended). My question is, if I apply Kirchoff's voltage law: VR+VC+VL-Vi=0, I'm not quite sure how this would be set up when Vo is between R1R2 & C1C2?
I believe this ia 4 Loop circuit:
I1 = I2 + I3 + I4
I2 = [(Vin-Vout) / C1] + (Vout / C2)
I3 = [(Vin-Vout) / R1] + (Vout / R2)
I4 = Vin / L
Would this be correct for the assumption?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you label where the currents are with arrows in your diagram? So basically label where the currents "I1", "I2", "I3", etc.. are actually going. That way anyone can get an idea of the directions (i.e. In/Out) you're thinking about.

I was going to suggest using a node voltage method but it seems like you're on a good track for this problem.

The first thing I would suggest is you convert all of the components into "impedances". At least for me, it would be easier to analyze the circuit that way.

So think back to what the equation for an inductor, capacitor, and resistor is. That way, you can convert everything into the "s" domain (or omega format, whichever one you want to call it). Then, from there, you can start writing out equations/relationships. See if things might even cancel out when solving for Vout/Vin.

We're not allowed to give "direct" answers to problems on here. I'm just trying to give you tips/advice on what steps to take or approaches to use.
 
Thanks for the input. I'm not looking for the answer, but if you check my work to see if I'm evaluating the problem correctly so far. I ended up changing this to a 3 loop circuit. It's not finished since I haven't derived the transfer function yet but before I go any furthur, I was wonder what I have is correct. The attached pdf has six pages to it.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
If Z2(s)=C1*C2/(C1+C2)*s ;Z3=R1+R2 ;Z4=1/L/s

Then, in my opinion, since Vi/s=Z2(s)*I2(s)=Z3(s)*I3(s)=Z4(s)*I4(s)

I2(s)=Vi/s/(C1*C2)*(C1+C2)/s=Vi/s^2*(C1+C2)/(C1*C2)

I3(s)=Vi/s/(R1+R2)

I3(s)*R1+Vo-I2/C1/s=0

Vo=I2(s)/C1/s-I3(s)*R1
 

Attachments

  • Transfer Function Gs.jpg
    Transfer Function Gs.jpg
    48.9 KB · Views: 127
Fuji, the first thing to do is get rid of L. Since Vi is a voltage source, all L does is draw some current from Vi, but it has no effect on Vo.

R1 and R2 form a voltage divider across Vi, and C1 and C2 do the same thing.

Let the right hand terminal of Vi be ground (reference node), and calculate the voltage across R2 using the voltage divider formula; that will be the voltage at the top of Vo. Calculate the voltage across C2 using the voltage divider formula; that will be the voltage at the bottom of Vo. The value of Vo will be the difference of the voltage across R2 and the voltage across C2.
 
Thread 'Why wasn’t gravity included in the potential energy for this problem?'
I’m looking at the attached vibration problem. The solution in the manual includes the spring potential energy but does NOT include the gravitational potential energy of the hanging mass. Can someone explain why gravitational potential energy is not included when deriving the equation of motion? I tried asking ChatGPT but kept going in circles and couldn't figure out. Thanks!

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 187 ·
7
Replies
187
Views
58K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K