Transformation for accelerating observers

ralqs
Messages
97
Reaction score
1
Suppose two observers A and B are each accelerating at the same rate wrt an inertial reference frame, but are moving relative to one another at some uniform velocity. Will the transformation between the coordinates of an event as measured by A and B be the Lorentz transformation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say yes, since it doesn't matter that A and B are accelerating wrt to a third frame of reference. The key is that they are moving relative to each other at uniform velocity and you're using the lorentz transformation between them.
 
jedishrfu said:
The key is that they are moving relative to each other at uniform velocity and you're using the lorentz transformation between them.

It's not that simple. Check out the Bell Spaceship Paradox:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell's_spaceship_paradox

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/spaceship_puzzle.html

ralqs said:
Suppose two observers A and B are each accelerating at the same rate wrt an inertial reference frame, but are moving relative to one another at some uniform velocity. Will the transformation between the coordinates of an event as measured by A and B be the Lorentz transformation?

In addition to the Bell Spaceship Paradox, it's also good to check out Rindler coordinates and the Rindler horizon:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates

http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au/SCIENCE/Rindler/RindlerHorizon.html

As the above links should show you, there are a number of subtleties lurking in the question you've posed. One is that the term "accelerating at the same rate" is ambiguous. Another is that "the coordinates of an event as measured by A and B" is also ambiguous. So the answer to your question could be "yes" or "no" depending on how you choose to tighten up the specifications of your scenario to resolve the ambiguities. I suspect that the answer to the question you were trying to ask, once the ambiguities are resolved, is "no".

Edit: I should mention that "moving relative to one another at uniform velocity" is also ambiguous in this scenario. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The transformation between uniformly accelerating and inertial observers is given here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates

If you start with an observer "at rest" in the accelerating frame you have a world line(t,x,y,z)=(t,x_0,0,0)

Transforming that to the inertial coordinates you get: (T,X,Y,Z)=(x_0 \sinh(g t), x_0 \cosh(g t),0,0)

So a similarly accelerating observer, but with different initial velocity will have the worldline: (T,X,Y,Z)=(x_0 \sinh(g t), x_0 \cosh(g t)+v_0 t,0,0)

Transforming this back to the accelerating frame gives: (t,x,y,z)=\left( \frac{1}{g} atan\left( \frac{x_0 \sinh(g t)}{v_0 t+x_0 \cosh(g t)} \right),\sqrt{v_0^2 t^2+x_0^2+2v_0 x_0 t \cosh(g t)},0,0\right)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top