Transformer core considered as a waveguide

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of whether the iron core of a transformer can be considered as a transmission line or waveguide, particularly in the context of energy transfer from the primary to the secondary winding. Participants examine the similarities and differences between the transformer core and the Goubau line, focusing on the nature of electromagnetic wave propagation and the mechanisms involved in energy transfer.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the iron core of a transformer resembles a "magnetic version" of the Goubau line, suggesting it may convey energy similarly.
  • Others argue that the Goubau line involves surface wave propagation with a dielectric coating, which does not align with the longitudinal polarization of the transformer core.
  • A participant notes that electromagnetic waves propagate transversely to their electric and magnetic fields, implying that the transformer core primarily exhibits near field effects rather than waveguide propagation.
  • One participant suggests that when a pulse is applied to the primary, a wave must propagate along the core to the secondary, indicating that the process is not instantaneous.
  • Another participant questions the analogy, proposing that if the primary and secondary are arranged in a bifilar configuration, the system could function without an iron core, thus challenging the necessity of the core for energy transfer.
  • Some participants assert that the mathematical representations of waveguide propagation do not apply to the transformer core, emphasizing that the mechanism of magnetic coupling is fundamentally different from wave propagation.
  • It is noted that a Goubau line operates over many wavelengths, while a transformer is relatively short compared to the wavelength, raising questions about the validity of treating them as analogous systems.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty regarding the treatment of longitudinal modes, agreeing that wavelength considerations may invalidate the waveguide analogy for the transformer core.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the transformer core can be treated as a waveguide. Multiple competing views are presented, with some supporting the analogy and others challenging its validity based on differing mechanisms and propagation characteristics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the analogy, including the dependence on definitions of wave propagation and the specific configurations of the transformer and Goubau line. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the applicability of waveguide concepts to transformer cores.

tech99
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,051
Reaction score
1,420
Has anyone considered the iron core of a transformer to act as a transmission line or waveguide, where it conveys energy from primary to secondary? The core seems to resemble a "magnetic version" of the single wire Goubau line.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Skimming the Goubau line article I note that there is a dielectric coating and the UHF signal is transmitting via surface waves. This does not fit analogously with the transformer core which is being longitudinally polarized. Also you are not getting the propagation down the length of the iron core. Keep in mind that E-M waves propagate transverse to their E and M fields. While the various modes of a wave guide will correspond to different E vs B field directions (as in radial vs circumfrerential or x vs y ) they still invariably align perpendicular to the propagating waves. With the iron core the B field is along the length so one is rather getting "near field effects" with respect to the transmission of power along the core length.
 
jambaugh said:
Skimming the Goubau line article I note that there is a dielectric coating and the UHF signal is transmitting via surface waves. This does not fit analogously with the transformer core which is being longitudinally polarized. Also you are not getting the propagation down the length of the iron core. Keep in mind that E-M waves propagate transverse to their E and M fields. While the various modes of a wave guide will correspond to different E vs B field directions (as in radial vs circumfrerential or x vs y ) they still invariably align perpendicular to the propagating waves. With the iron core the B field is along the length so one is rather getting "near field effects" with respect to the transmission of power along the core length.
Thank you for your comments. I had forgotten that the Goubau line was first described with a dielectric coating. For propagation by waveguide modes, I think we can see a longitudinal field component, so B or E may not be perpendicular to the direction of propagation.
For the Goubau line, the magnetic field seems to surround the wire, whilst with the iron core the electric field surrounds the core circumferentially. For Goubau, the electric field is longitudinal and for the iron core the magnetic field is longitudinal. So the fields seem to have the same form but reversed. And when a pulse is applied to the primary, I feel that a wave must propagate along the core to the secondary - it cannot be instantaneous.
Those are my reasons for making the suggestion, and I wondered if a transmission line view (e.g. the effect of mismatching) would be compatible with the basic operation observed with a transformer.
 
tech99 said:
when a pulse is applied to the primary, I feel that a wave must propagate along the core to the secondary - it cannot be instantaneous.
?? what if primary and secondary are a bifilar arrangement instead of two coils separated as on a bobbin wound ?
Then it'd work without an iron core.http://amasci.com/tesla/tmistk.html
 
jim hardy said:
?? what if primary and secondary are a bifilar arrangement instead of two coils separated as on a bobbin wound ?
Then it'd work without an iron core.http://amasci.com/tesla/tmistk.html
It seems that in the case of two coils spaced by air, we are linking the two transducers together via "free space", so we do not have waveguide propagation. The iron core enables the coils to exchange energy when spaced apart, by acting as a waveguide.
 
It does not act like a waveguide in that the mathematical representations of waveguide propagation do not apply. It is a completely different mechanism (magnetic coupling) as opposed to wave propagation (and the associated Modes).

Just because there is energy across a distance in the two cases does not mean they are in any way analogous. Like comparing a wire to a laser.
 
A Goubau line is a traveling wave structure. Launching it involves a conical matching section at each end and it operates over many wavelengths. That's very different from the operation of a transformer which is short compared with the wavelength involved. There are parallels between the two, of course, because they both work with EM but I have to ask Why would one want to treat them the same? Would you consider analysing a Goubau line as a kind of Transformer? I can only see a lot of grief in that direction.
 
I certainly may be way off with respect to the issue of longitudinal modes but I would agree with sophiecentaur, that wavelength considerations invalidate the treatment of the core as a waveguide. That is what I was thinking with my "near field" comment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
64
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K