Transforming Tensor Components with Coordinate Systems

  • Thread starter Thread starter peripatein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components Tensor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on transforming tensor components, specifically the tensor Ai j, under a new coordinate system using the transformation matrix R. The key equation derived is A(BAR)i j = RilRjmAlm, where A1 2 = A2 1 = A and all other components are zero. The transformation relies on the relationship ∂q(BAR)k/∂qn = Rnk, which is crucial for expressing the transformed tensor in terms of R. The participant seeks clarification on incorporating the symmetry of the tensor components into the transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Tensor algebra and notation
  • Coordinate transformation principles
  • Understanding of transformation matrices
  • Basic knowledge of linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of symmetric tensors in transformations
  • Learn about the derivation and application of transformation matrices in tensor calculus
  • Explore the implications of coordinate transformations on tensor components
  • Investigate advanced topics in differential geometry related to tensors
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and mathematics who are working with tensor analysis and coordinate transformations.

peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Homework Statement


The components of the tensor Ai j are A1 2 = A2 1 = A, whereas all the other components are zero. I am asked to write A(BAR)i j, following a transformation to a new coordinate system, given that ∂q(BAR)k/∂qn = Rnk. I am expected to write my answer in terms of R.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that A(BAR)i j = ∂q(BAR)i/∂qm * ∂q(BAR)j/∂qn * Am n
But how may I proceed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am wondering why no one has yet replied to this question.
Nevertheless, if anyone is reading this, I'd appreciate some help with this.
I happen to know that the answer is:
[itex]\bar{A}[/itex]ij = RilRjmAlm, but how may I bring under account the fact that Axy = Ayx = A?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K