Transient oscillations in transformer?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transient response of a weakly coupled transformer, specifically when subjected to a Heaviside step function input. The participant calculated the angular frequency using the formula ω=√((R1R2 - ((L1R2 + L2R1)²)/(4(M² - L1L2)))/(M² - L1L2)). The analysis revealed a decaying oscillatory response despite the absence of capacitance, leading to the conclusion that the system's coupling is critical, particularly when M = √(L1L2). The participant acknowledged an error in their calculations, noting that the angular frequency would be imaginary due to M² - L1L2 being negative, which alters the nature of the oscillations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transformer theory and mutual inductance
  • Familiarity with Laplace transforms and their applications in circuit analysis
  • Knowledge of differential equations and their role in transient analysis
  • Basic grasp of oscillatory systems and damping factors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of weakly coupled transformers on transient response
  • Learn about the application of Laplace transforms in electrical engineering
  • Investigate the conditions for perfect coupling in transformers
  • Explore the effects of imaginary frequencies on oscillatory behavior in circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, circuit designers, and students studying transformer dynamics and transient analysis will benefit from this discussion.

guillefix
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I calculated the transient response of a weakly coupled transformer (M ≠ L1L2), for a heaviside step function input. I get a decaying oscillatory response, even though I didn't include any capacitance, can this be? If interested here is the angular frequency I get:

ω=\sqrt{\frac{R_{1}R_{2}-\frac{(L_{1}R_{2}+L_{2}R_{1})^{2}}{4(M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2})}}{M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2}}}

I think the units come out right, which is always a good check
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It would be much easier to help you if you would post a schematic of the transformer model, and the equations you wrote to solve the system. Show how you arrived at the solution from the equations.

Also, the system is perfectly coupled when M = SQRT(L1 L2), not M = L1 L2.
 
The Electrician said:
Also, the system is perfectly coupled when M = SQRT(L1 L2), not M = L1 L2.

Yes that's what I meant :P

The Electrician said:
It would be much easier to help you if you would post a schematic of the transformer model, and the equations you wrote to solve the system. Show how you arrived at the solution from the equations.

True, I should have posted more detail. The model I've used is quite simple, with just coupled inductors and resistors. The schematic is attached.

The equations I used can also be found in hyperphysics here (with another schematic acutally): http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/imgmag/tracir.gif

What I did was make Vp a heaviside step funciton, and then take the Laplace transform of both sides getting:

M*s*F1-L2*s*F2-R2*F2=M*I1(0)+L2*I2(0)=0
M*s*F2-L1*s*F1-R1*F1=-Fp+M*I2(0)+L1*I1(0)=-V0/s

Where M is the mutual inductance, F1 is the Laplace transform of I1, F2 is the laplace transform of I2, and Fp of Vp and V0 is the size of the heaviside; and the rest can be read in the picture.

I solved the linear system and got for the weakly coupled case:

F_{1}=\frac{V_{0}(L_{2}s+R_{2})}{s((M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2})s^{2}+(L_{1}R_{2}+L_{2}R_{1})s+R_{1}R_{2})}

F_{2}=\frac{V_{0}M}{s((M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2})s^{2}+(L_{1}R_{2}+L_{2}R_{1})s+R_{1}R_{2})}

And doing the inverse laplace:

I_{1}=\frac{V_{0}e^{-λt}}{ω(M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2})}(L_{2}sin(ωt)+R_{2}(\frac{1}{2i}(\frac{e^{(iω-λ)t}}{iω-λ}+\frac{^{-(iω+λ)t}}{iω+λ})+\frac{ω}{ω^{2}+λ^{2}}))

Where λ=\frac{L_{1}R_{2}+L_{2}R_{1}}{2(M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2})} and ω is what I have on my previous post. I2 is obviously similar to second part of I1.

I just realized now that my ω would be imaginary due to M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2} being negative, which means that my sin would become an i*sinh. But I also realized the decaying exponential is not decaying anymore..I think I need to rearange this and see..
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K