Transient oscillations in transformer?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the transient response of a weakly coupled transformer subjected to a Heaviside step function input, resulting in a decaying oscillatory response despite the absence of capacitance. The user provides a complex equation for angular frequency, indicating a misunderstanding of the conditions for perfect coupling in transformers. A schematic and equations are requested to clarify the model used for calculations. The user realizes that the angular frequency becomes imaginary due to the negative value of M² - L1L2, affecting the sinusoidal response and indicating a need for further analysis. This highlights the importance of accurate parameter relationships in transformer modeling.
guillefix
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I calculated the transient response of a weakly coupled transformer (M ≠ L1L2), for a heaviside step function input. I get a decaying oscillatory response, even though I didn't include any capacitance, can this be? If interested here is the angular frequency I get:

ω=\sqrt{\frac{R_{1}R_{2}-\frac{(L_{1}R_{2}+L_{2}R_{1})^{2}}{4(M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2})}}{M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2}}}

I think the units come out right, which is always a good check
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It would be much easier to help you if you would post a schematic of the transformer model, and the equations you wrote to solve the system. Show how you arrived at the solution from the equations.

Also, the system is perfectly coupled when M = SQRT(L1 L2), not M = L1 L2.
 
The Electrician said:
Also, the system is perfectly coupled when M = SQRT(L1 L2), not M = L1 L2.

Yes that's what I meant :P

The Electrician said:
It would be much easier to help you if you would post a schematic of the transformer model, and the equations you wrote to solve the system. Show how you arrived at the solution from the equations.

True, I should have posted more detail. The model I've used is quite simple, with just coupled inductors and resistors. The schematic is attached.

The equations I used can also be found in hyperphysics here (with another schematic acutally): http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/imgmag/tracir.gif

What I did was make Vp a heaviside step funciton, and then take the Laplace transform of both sides getting:

M*s*F1-L2*s*F2-R2*F2=M*I1(0)+L2*I2(0)=0
M*s*F2-L1*s*F1-R1*F1=-Fp+M*I2(0)+L1*I1(0)=-V0/s

Where M is the mutual inductance, F1 is the Laplace transform of I1, F2 is the laplace transform of I2, and Fp of Vp and V0 is the size of the heaviside; and the rest can be read in the picture.

I solved the linear system and got for the weakly coupled case:

F_{1}=\frac{V_{0}(L_{2}s+R_{2})}{s((M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2})s^{2}+(L_{1}R_{2}+L_{2}R_{1})s+R_{1}R_{2})}

F_{2}=\frac{V_{0}M}{s((M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2})s^{2}+(L_{1}R_{2}+L_{2}R_{1})s+R_{1}R_{2})}

And doing the inverse laplace:

I_{1}=\frac{V_{0}e^{-λt}}{ω(M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2})}(L_{2}sin(ωt)+R_{2}(\frac{1}{2i}(\frac{e^{(iω-λ)t}}{iω-λ}+\frac{^{-(iω+λ)t}}{iω+λ})+\frac{ω}{ω^{2}+λ^{2}}))

Where λ=\frac{L_{1}R_{2}+L_{2}R_{1}}{2(M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2})} and ω is what I have on my previous post. I2 is obviously similar to second part of I1.

I just realized now that my ω would be imaginary due to M^{2}-L_{1}L_{2} being negative, which means that my sin would become an i*sinh. But I also realized the decaying exponential is not decaying anymore..I think I need to rearange this and see..
 
Last edited:
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top