Transistor Approximations: NPN BC548 vs. 2N3904, PNP BC559 vs. 2N3906

  • Thread starter Thread starter nomizzz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Npn Transistor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a senior physics major's project to create a Transistor Logic to RS-232 interface using alternative transistors, specifically substituting 2N3906 for BC559 and 2N3904 for BC548 due to availability issues. Participants confirm that these substitutions are suitable for the application, but emphasize the importance of understanding RS-232 signaling, which requires specific voltage levels for logical states. It is noted that RS-232 signaling operates with positive and negative voltage ranges, necessitating careful voltage management. The original poster plans to breadboard the circuit and ensure voltage levels are appropriate before finalizing the project. Updates on the project's progress are anticipated.
nomizzz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

I'm currently taking Electrical Engineering as senior physics major at Fordham University and have decided to take on a little side project to gain a better understanding.

What I'm attempting to create is my own Transistor Logic -> RS-232 (Rs-232 refers to the serial (com1) port on computers). I found a perfect simple circuit schematic which I've attached below, and I've purchased the breadboard, soldering iron and all the exact resistors, capacitors and diodes required. My problem is I couldn't find the two transistors, NPN BC548 and PNP BC559 at any of my nearby Radio Shacks.

After comparing the spec sheets online and doing a little bit of googling, I found that PNP transistor 2N3906's characteristics and specs seem to fit pretty well with BC559 and BC548 fits fairly well with 2N3904's. Unfortunately, we've only just got into transistors in EE right now and I have no equations to simplify them and determine if the voltage will be operable or even destructive for the computer that will be receiving the signal and sending it back.

Below is a fairly comprehensive diagram for the circuit that I retrieved from a website. My alterations, as I said, will be subbing in the 2N3906 for the BC559 and the 2N3904 for the BC548. What will this mean for my final voltages?



Xbox_360_lite-on_rs232_simple.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's really arbitrary for DC analysis. Beta of general purpose transistors is anywhere from 100 to 250. They are both silicon transistors with about 0.7v drop.
 
You should use the recommended voltages unless you know what is on the other end. The PNP collector output is received by some comparator or transistor with a threshold which you do not know.
 
nomizzz said:
Hello everybody,

I'm currently taking Electrical Engineering as senior physics major at Fordham University and have decided to take on a little side project to gain a better understanding.

What I'm attempting to create is my own Transistor Logic -> RS-232 (Rs-232 refers to the serial (com1) port on computers). I found a perfect simple circuit schematic which I've attached below, and I've purchased the breadboard, soldering iron and all the exact resistors, capacitors and diodes required. My problem is I couldn't find the two transistors, NPN BC548 and PNP BC559 at any of my nearby Radio Shacks.

After comparing the spec sheets online and doing a little bit of googling, I found that PNP transistor 2N3906's characteristics and specs seem to fit pretty well with BC559 and BC548 fits fairly well with 2N3904's. Unfortunately, we've only just got into transistors in EE right now and I have no equations to simplify them and determine if the voltage will be operable or even destructive for the computer that will be receiving the signal and sending it back.

Below is a fairly comprehensive diagram for the circuit that I retrieved from a website. My alterations, as I said, will be subbing in the 2N3906 for the BC559 and the 2N3904 for the BC548. What will this mean for my final voltages?



Xbox_360_lite-on_rs232_simple.jpg

Two things. First, the 3904 and 3906 jellybean trnsistors will work fine for this application. Second, you are not understanding how the RS-232 signalling works. It requires +/- voltages to work. A logical "0" is a voltage between 5V and 15V, and a logical "1" is a voltage between -5V and -15V.

That's why most uC circuits will use a MAX232 chip or similar, for the level conversion from TTL or CMOS logic levels to RS232 voltage levels. You can find more information about RS-232 signalling at Maxim's website:

http://www.maxim-ic.com/

.
 
A big thanks to all for the quick and helpful replies.

I'm going to breadboard the circuit design and check to make sure the the voltage fall within the appropriate ranges that berkeman suggested. If that clears, I'm going to begin soldering the pieces on to circuit board I bought and solder the finished product to my input device.

I'll post an update when I'm done.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Back
Top