Translation and rotation of quadric surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on transforming the general equation of a quadric surface, represented as ##Ax^2 + By^2 + Cz^2 + Dxy + Eyz + Fxz + Gx + Hy + Iz + J = 0##, into simpler forms like ##Ax^2 + By^2 + J = 0## or ##Ax^2 + By^2 + Iz = 0## through translation and rotation. Key mathematical concepts include the use of symmetric matrices and orthogonal eigenvectors to achieve diagonalization via a rotation matrix R. The participants express frustration over the lack of instructional material on this topic, indicating that relevant chapters may have been omitted from their textbooks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadric surfaces and their equations
  • Familiarity with linear algebra concepts, specifically symmetric matrices and eigenvalues
  • Knowledge of matrix transformations, including rotation matrices
  • Basic calculus skills for completing the square in quadratic forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of symmetric matrices and their diagonalization
  • Learn about rotation matrices and their applications in transforming geometric shapes
  • Explore the method of completing the square in quadratic equations
  • Review advanced topics in linear algebra, focusing on eigenvectors and eigenvalues
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying geometry and linear algebra, as well as anyone involved in the transformation and analysis of quadric surfaces.

songoku
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
This is not homework. I try to study calculus by myself using James Stewart book and below is part of text that I want to ask about
Relevant Equations
Not sure
1695285603023.png


I want to ask how ##Ax^2+By^2+Cz^2+Dxy+Eyz+Fxz+Gx+Hy+Iz+J=0## can be brought to ##Ax^2+By^2+Cz^2+J=0## or ##Ax^2+By^2+Iz=0## using translation and rotation. There is no explanation in the book. What kind of translation and rotation are needed?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(1) The constants in the various forms are not the same.

(2) The variables int he various forms are not the same.

The general form can be written <br /> \begin{pmatrix} x &amp; y &amp; z \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} A &amp; \frac12D &amp; \frac12 F \\ \frac12 D &amp; B &amp; \frac12 E \\ \frac12 F &amp; \frac12 E &amp; C \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\y \\ z \end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix} G &amp; H &amp; I \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{pmatrix} + J = \mathbf{x}^TM\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{b}^T \mathbf{x} + J = 0. Now M is symmetric, so its eigenvalues are real and it has a basis of orthogonal eigenvectors; thus there exists a rotation (ie. a matrix R with determinant 1 such that R^{-1} = R^T) such that R^{-1}MR is diagonal. What happens if you now set \mathbf{x} = R\mathbf{X} in the general form and complete the squares in each variable for which the corresponding diagonal entry of R^{-1}MR is non-zero?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and e_jane
songoku said:
I try to study calculus by myself using James Stewart book...

I want to ask how ##Ax^2+By^2+Cz^2+Dxy+Eyz+Fxz+Gx+Hy+Iz+J=0## can be brought to ##Ax^2+By^2+Cz^2+J=0## or ##Ax^2+By^2+Iz=0## using translation and rotation. There is no explanation in the book.

They took out that whole chapter? Nice! I remember *hating* that chapter. :oldruck:
 
pasmith said:
(1) The constants in the various forms are not the same.

(2) The variables int he various forms are not the same.

The general form can be written <br /> \begin{pmatrix} x &amp; y &amp; z \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} A &amp; \frac12D &amp; \frac12 F \\ \frac12 D &amp; B &amp; \frac12 E \\ \frac12 F &amp; \frac12 E &amp; C \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\y \\ z \end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix} G &amp; H &amp; I \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{pmatrix} + J = \mathbf{x}^TM\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{b}^T \mathbf{x} + J = 0. Now M is symmetric, so its eigenvalues are real and it has a basis of orthogonal eigenvectors; thus there exists a rotation (ie. a matrix R with determinant 1 such that R^{-1} = R^T) such that R^{-1}MR is diagonal. What happens if you now set \mathbf{x} = R\mathbf{X} in the general form and complete the squares in each variable for which the corresponding diagonal entry of R^{-1}MR is non-zero?
I will try first and update what I have done.

e_jane said:
They took out that whole chapter? Nice! I remember *hating* that chapter. :oldruck:
Can you maybe tell me the name of the chapter or anything related to the transformation of quadric surface so I can learn the basic?

Thanks
 
e_jane said:
They took out that whole chapter? Nice! I remember *hating* that chapter. :oldruck:
songoku said:
Can you maybe tell me the name of the chapter or anything related to the transformation of quadric surface so I can learn the basic?

I sold that textbook back to the university's bookstore about thirty years ago. Sorry.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
6K