Transmission through constructive interference

AI Thread Summary
To achieve constructive interference for green light (525 nm) transmitted through a film with a refractive index of 1.46 on glass with an index of 1.32, the minimum film thickness must account for phase shifts. The phase shift occurs due to the higher index of the film compared to air, resulting in a half-wavelength shift for reflected rays. The correct formula for determining the thickness involves calculating the effective wavelength in the film and considering the phase shifts at both interfaces. The discussion highlights the need to clarify the values of m and how to handle the indices when calculating the thickness. Accurate calculations are essential for determining the optimal film thickness for constructive interference.
threewingedfury
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
A sheet of glass having an index of refraction of 1.32 is to be coated with a film of material having an index of refraction of 1.46 such that green light with a wavelength of 525 nm (in air) is preferentially transmitted via constructive interference.

(a) What is the minimum thickness of the film that will achieve the result in nm?


I was given the equation:
L=lamda/n2-n1

So 525x10^-9/.14 = 37500 nm

But this isn't right because:

With the numbers n2=1.55 and n1=1.40 the thickness is 169 nm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't look like the equation you are using is accurate.

First of all, you must calculate the phase shifts involved.

1. Because the film has a higher index than air, the rays reflected by the film will experience a half-wavelength phase shift.

2. Rays will also be reflected off the glass-film interface. These go through a 2d phase-shift, where d is the film thickness. As the glass has a lower index than the film, no half-wavelength shift occurs here.

For constructive interference, the waves must be in-phase, so:

m \lambda_f = 2d - \frac{\lambda_f}{2}
 
Last edited:
so what would m be? do you add the two indecies together, or subtract them?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top