A Transverse polarizations of a massless spin 1 particle

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Physical polarization vectors are transverse, ##p\cdot{\epsilon}=0##, where ##p## is the momentum of a photon and ##\epsilon## is a polarization vector.
Physical polarization vectors are unchanged under a gauge transformation ##\epsilon + a\cdot{p}=\epsilon##, where ##a## is some arbitrary constant.
1. Why are physical polarization vectors transverse?

2. Why is ##p\cdot{\epsilon}=0## the condition for the transverseness of ##\epsilon##?

2. How is ##\epsilon + a\cdot{p}=\epsilon## a gauge transformation? The gauge transformations I know are of the form ##A_{\mu}\rightarrow A_{\mu}+\partial_{\mu}\Lambda##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your text is ambiguous (if not plain wrong) to use both classical and quantum terminology. The polarization vector is assigned to a classical em wave, while p is the photon's momentum (3 or 4-momentum, it's not clear from what you wrote). The quantum analogue to the classical wave's polarization vector is called the helicity operator. Leaving this aside, for 3. I can say that the ##\epsilon## is not unique which can be (comparing to the standard gauge field theory) thought of a gauge transformation. For 2. the answer should be obvious (hint: why are the E and B fields called transverse?). The answer to 2. automatically sheds light (pun intended!) on 1.
 
Thank you for the excellent answer.

I have another question.

Assume that, in the centre of mass frame, photon 1 moves in the positive ##z##-direction so that photon 2 moves in the negative ##z##-direction.

Then, the helicity states of the two photons ##1## and ##2## are given by ##(\epsilon_{\mu}^{\pm})^{1}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(0,1,\pm i,0)## and ##(\epsilon_{\mu}^{\pm})^{2}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(0,1,\mp i,0)##.

1. Why is there a relative negative sign for the helicity state of each photon?
2. I know that these are so-called circular helicity states. But, how are these the components of these helicity states determined?
3. Is it a common terminology to call ##\epsilon^{+}## the positive helicity state and ##\epsilon^{-}## the negative helicity state?
 
There are two helicity states ##\epsilon^{\pm}##. What you've written down is the standard basis for the radiation gauge ##A^0=0##, ##\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}=0## for a photon with momentum in ##3##-direction. Of course, only either the upper or the lower choice of signs gives a complete set. The one basis is just interchanging the basis vectors of the other.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Back
Top