B Travel at 0.5c & Observe Redshifted Light Traveling at c

Frederick T
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
It's come to my attention that if we were to travel in a spaceship at 0.5c directly away from our sun, I would observe that the light from the sun as being red shifted. What I would also observe was that this red shifted electromagnetic wave would in fact travel away from me in the spaceship traveling at 0.5c at the speed of light with its new redshifted properties. I would be lead to conclude that light does not, in fact, have a speed limit, but the speed limit exists only as a spacetime limitation to the inertial frame of reference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can conclude that. Light travels at the same speed in all inertial frames. What you observe as red shifted light ie lower energy might be observed in another inertial frame as blue shifted light and yet it’s the same light, the same photons. In all cases, the speed is the speed of light but the energy is different.
 
Frederick T said:
What I would also observe was that this red shifted electromagnetic wave would in fact travel away from me in the spaceship traveling at 0.5c at the speed of light with its new redshifted properties.
No you would not. This would be true under Galilean relativity, but that is not an accurate description of reality. You need to use Einstein's relativity, and time dilation, length contraction, and the relativity of simultaneity conspire to make your measurements of the speed of light invariant. This has been extensively tested - see the FAQ linked in the sticky thread in this forum.

This is covered in all introductions to SR.

Edit: having read Nugatory's and Dale's responses below, it's possible I'm misreading the OP. The above response may or may not be relevant to the question actually being asked.
 
Last edited:
Frederick T said:
wave would in fact travel away from me in the spaceship traveling at 0.5c at the speed of light with its new redshifted properties.
The syntax is a bit tangled here, but if what you mean is:
1) relative to the earth, the spaceship is moving at .5c and the flash of light is moving at c.
2) relative to the spaceship, the Earth is moving backwards at .5c and the flash of light is moving at c.
then you have it right.
 
Frederick T said:
What I would also observe was that this red shifted electromagnetic wave would in fact travel away from me in the spaceship traveling at 0.5c at the speed of light with its new redshifted properties
I don’t understand what you mean to say here. Can you please clarify?
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top