I Travelling at the speed of light

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the theoretical implications of traveling at the speed of light, focusing on the operational challenges of such a spaceship. It highlights that achieving light speed would require instantaneous acceleration, making it impossible to control the distance traveled, potentially leading to catastrophic collisions. The conversation also touches on the concept of mass and the Higgs Field, questioning whether it could be neutralized to allow for light-speed travel. However, the inability to decelerate or stop once at light speed raises significant concerns about the feasibility of this concept. Ultimately, the thread was locked due to speculation not permitted in the forum.
Brunolem33
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I don't know if this kind of thought experiment is authorized here, but let's give it a try.

Let's assume that we had managed to build a spaceship able to travel at the speed of light.

Since relativity forbids to accelerate until reaching such speed, the spaceship would have to reach it instantaneously, like a photon.

But this is not the issue.

The issue is: how could we operate such a spaceship?

And I am not talking about levers and joysticks, but about establishing a course and reaching a destination safely.

Because it seems to me that if such a spaceship was pointed towards, say, Mars, it would be impossible to reach this planet without crashing on its surface like a bug hitting a windshield.

In other words, there would be no way to control the distance travelled.

The conclusion being that the ability to travel at light speed would be useless.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The same procedure to gain instantaneously c and survive it, which is simply not possible, will allow you to lose the speed in reverse order. So your theory lacks at three points.
 
I don't have a theory, just a question, and the issue is not about the survival of someone inside...one could assume that it would be entirely robotic.

The question is: is it possible for an object moving at light speed to stop in any way other than hitting another object at full speed?
 
Since relativity forbids objects with mass from traveling at c, we can't answer your question.
 
Constructing a ship with zero mass would certainly make you a legend in the history of engineering.
 
If, as it seems, mass is not a property of the particles, but is somehow the result of these particles interfering with a so-called Higgs Field, one could find a way to temporarily neutralize the effects of this field, thus freeing an object from its mass and instantly propelling it at light speed.

Now, I don't know if it has been proven, at least theoretically, whether the Higgs Field can or cannot be neutralized.
 
Brunolem33 said:
Now, I don't know if it has been proven, at least theoretically, whether the Higgs Field can or cannot be neutralized.
Not that we know of. But if you can switch it off, what prevents you from turning it on again to stop?
 
Well, that's the problem...what would prevent me, or anyone else, to switch it back on would be a lack of...time!

Because, as far as I understand the underlying physics, once propelled the speed of light, the distance between the object and its destination would be reduced to zero and time would stand still.

In other words, the object would reach its destination in no time, leaving no possibility to switch its mass back on and let it decelerate.

Or am I totally wrong?
 
I'm sorry but we don't allow speculation of this nature here at PF. Thread locked.
 
Back
Top