Treating Cables with Pulleys & Blocks - Leonel

  • Thread starter Thread starter leonel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the dynamics of cables in a pulley and block system, specifically addressing the motion of cable E and its relationship with blocks A and B. It is established that cable E's length increases at 18 in/sec, while the lengths of cables C and D remain equal and change at a rate of -9 in/sec each. The participants note a discrepancy between their calculations and the book's answers regarding the velocities of cable D and C. The book suggests cable D has a velocity of +36 in/s, leading to confusion over the correct values. This highlights potential errors in the textbook "Vector Mechanics for Engineers" by Beer and Johnston.
leonel
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Can any of you help me in how to treat the cables in the arrangement pulleys and blocks attached ?.

thanks, Leonel
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Is cable E fixed to the ground on one end, by that little parallelogram block?
 
Assuming that the cable is of fixed length and fastened at its end, then the length of the cable, E, is the distance from that fixed point to block B and so its length is increasing at 18 in/sec just like the blocks motion. Also, it is clear that, since the two pulleys can be taken to be right up against blocks A and B, C and D are of equal length at all times and so have the same rate of change.
Specifically, C+ D+ E= fixed length so dC/dt+ dD/dt+ dE/dt= 0. dC/dt= dD/dt and
dE/dt= 18: 2dC/dt= -18 or dC/dt= dD/dt= -9 in/sec.

Since the distance between blocks A and B are decreasing in length by 9 in/sec, A's speed relative to B is 9 in/ sec: yes, A's speed relative to the stationary base is 27 in/second.
 
That's correct, Chen !
 
HalsofIvy, thanks a lot for your response ! My thoughts have been the same of yours..

But, the problem is that the book responses are: cable D Velocity is assumed to be + 36 in/s while the Vcd is - 18 in/s. therefore, that makes Vc = + 18 in/s. What results in a complete difference...Maybe some typing problems (2 mistakes ??!) in the book "Vector Mechanics for engineers" Beer and Johnston" fifth ed. Ex.11.42.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top