Tree Trunk Illusion: Does it Disappear Over the Horizon?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perception of a tree's trunk as an observer moves away from it on a flat plane. It argues that the trunk does not disappear below the horizon, contradicting a claim made by another participant. The conversation highlights the importance of defining conditions accurately, particularly whether the surface is flat or spherical. It references Nathaniel Bowditch's work, which provides a method for estimating horizon distance based on eye height. Ultimately, clarity in the initial problem statement is emphasized to avoid confusion in such discussions.
Ryan Bruch
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Supposed there is a tree on a perfectly flat plane. If an observer in front of that tree moves further and further away from the tree, the tree would look smaller and smaller. When the observer moves further and further away, would the lower part of the tree's trunk seem to disappear as if sinking below the horizon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Why would it?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
A person claimed that it does and that he had observed it before, on Earth though. These are his illustrations:

fig74.jpg


fig76.jpg


fig78.jpg


fig79.jpg


fig80.jpg
 
Earth is curved, an oblate spheroid.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
In more words, what Doug is telling you is that YOU were the one that specified a condition of a perfectly flat surface, thus, there is no such thing as a horizon. So, what is it? a flat surface or an sphere...please state your problem correctly and fully form the beginning.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
In Nathaniel Bowditch's American Practical Navigator is listed a most useful thumb-rule for estimating the distance to the horizon for practical heights of eye.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top