Tricky relfection/absorbtion optics question

  • Thread starter Thread starter zigga15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
zigga15
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have the following question:

A disabled tanker leaks kerosene (n = 1.20) into the Persian
Gulf creating a large slick on the top of the water (n = 1.30).

a) If you looking straight down from an aeroplane, while the sun is overhead, at a region
of the slick where the thickness is 460 nm, for which wavelength(s) of visible light is
the reflection brightest because of constructive interference?

b) If you are scuba diving directly under this same region of the slick, for which
wavelength(s) of visible light is the transmitted intensity strongest?

I understand that some of the rays will be reflected and some absorbed by both mediums. I found this formulae somewhere in my lecture notes but I am not sure what the 'I's mean: I/I0 = ((n1 - n2)/(n1 + n2))^2

Ive been trying to slug this question out for ages and its frustrating because i kinda know what is going on just don't know how to quantify it, help is much appreciated - cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your equation, I_0 is the incident intensity and I the reflected ilntensity.
But that simple equation is for a single interface, not a thin film.
The derivation for a film is done in some grad EM texts.
(It is given as a problem in Jackson.) The results are:
a) The reflection is a maximum when \lambda=n_2 d=1.2X460 nm.
b) The transmission is a maximum when \lambda is twice that in (a).
 
ok thanks mate that really helps - cheers
 
You don't need to go to that depth to solve this problem. There are two standard simple equations for the wavelengths that produce maximum and minimum intensity in thin-film interference:

m \lambda = 2nt

(m + 1/2) \lambda = 2nt

where m is an integer and t is the thickness of the film. One of these gives the maximum and the other one gives the minimum, but which one does which depends on the situation. I'm too lazy tonight to write a lecture about it on the spot, so look in your textbook for these formulas and read the discussion surrounding them (along with any examples). Or try here:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/thinfilm.html

That page uses d instead of t, and includes a \cos \beta to cover situations where the light isn't perpendicular (normal) to the film. In your problem, \cos \beta = 1.

After reading that stuff, if you have questions, ask away!
 
Last edited:
Yes, those were the simple formulas I used. The complicated derivation I referred to is to get the reflection coefficient as a function of wavelength.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Back
Top