Trig and Calc-Based Physics. Which is easier?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bogrune
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether to take trigonometry-based physics or directly pursue calculus-based physics. Many participants suggest that calculus-based physics offers a deeper understanding of concepts, as it explains the origins of equations rather than just their application. While some argue that trigonometry-based physics can serve as a helpful introduction, others believe that if a student is comfortable with calculus, they should skip the trigonometry course. The experience of taking both types of physics is noted to vary, with some finding that prior exposure to algebra/trig physics aids in grasping calculus-based material. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the value of calculus in simplifying and enriching the learning experience in physics.
Bogrune
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I don't really know if "easier" is the right word for this question, but I'm undecided about whether I should take trignonometry-based physics in order to get ready for calculus-based physics.

I heard from numerous students that calc.-based physics is probably one of the hardest classes that I'll take. At the same time, other students told me that Accounting 101 was going to be a lot harder than Accounting 100, but I found Accounting 101 a lot easier than Acc. 100, and the reason for that is because Acc. 100 was a lot more simple and to-the-point, but I felt like that was the reason that I found the more basic class harder than the more advanced class. Thus, I felt like I never really needed Acc. 100 to get ready for Acc. 101. Will it be the same story for Trig-based physics and Calc-based physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More or less. At most schools, calculus-based physics and algebra/trig-based physics are pretty similar the first semester. Calculus is usually used only to simplify certain derivations. In the second semester (which is mostly E&M) they diverge more, because calc-based courses usually get into the integral versions of Gauss's Law and Ampere's Law, whereas algebra/trig-based courses might not cover those two laws at all.
 
Bogrune said:
Thus, I felt like I never really needed Acc. 100 to get ready for Acc. 101. Will it be the same story for Trig-based physics and Calc-based physics?

It could be. One thing that I found was that calculus made things *easier*. Without calculus, doing equations with a hand saw, but once you have calculus, it's like someone handing you a power saw. It takes a bit of effort to learn how to use it, but it makes your life a lot, lot easier.

If you can handle the calculus, I'd skip the trig-based physics.
 
In my opinion, there's something you get from calc-based physics that is just lacking in algebra-based physics. While you might understand how to solve problems in algebra/trig-based physics, calculus-based physics shows you where the equations come from.

Calc-based physics is really quite beautiful.
 
It helps to take algebra/trig physics beforehand (if you've got the time for it). I say this because you're basically going through the same material again, just at a deeper level. I took general physics 1 last summer and now I'm taking calc-physics 1. I recognize/remember a lot of the concepts from the earlier class. I think it helps me. This is just my experience though and I'm sure it's different for everyone else.
 
contramundum said:
It helps to take algebra/trig physics beforehand (if you've got the time for it). I say this because you're basically going through the same material again, just at a deeper level. I took general physics 1 last summer and now I'm taking calc-physics 1. I recognize/remember a lot of the concepts from the earlier class. I think it helps me. This is just my experience though and I'm sure it's different for everyone else.

I agree. It's good to get an introduction to the concepts, especially if you didn't have physics in high school. Even in an intro class you'll learn a lot, like how to draw force diagrams.
 
Usually algebra based physics is catered to premed type students so although the material is more or less similar the work given and the expectations about it are much less.

I mean while I have homework that takes me like 5 hours to do and that gets assigned 3 times a week, a premed friend gets a little worksheet where it asks for a torque and he just multiplies the given force times a given distance.

The calculus helps you understand things easier if you can speak the language.
 
Chunkysalsa said:
I mean while I have homework that takes me like 5 hours to do and that gets assigned 3 times a week, a premed friend gets a little worksheet where it asks for a torque and he just multiplies the given force times a given distance.

To provide a counter-example for the OP, in my general physics 1 class there were no "plug and chug" worksheets as Chunkysalsa describes. We were usually assigned about 15 problems per week out of the textbook (Physics by Giambattista).
 
Sorry for the late reply everyone, I've had a pretty rough week at school. Through my opinion of all your comments, I think I'll take my chances and take Calc-Based Physics once I've finished taking Calculus 2. I'm both good at mathematics because I am very dependent on independent studies, and I like to study topics on both the textbooks and on external sources. Mostly, becuase I'm the kind of person who simply loves math. Thanks again everyone!
 
Back
Top