Trig Help - Need Help Verifying This Identity

  • Thread starter Thread starter dec1ble
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Trig
AI Thread Summary
To verify the identity sin x + tan x / 1 + cos x = tan x, the discussion focuses on simplifying the left side. The user suggests multiplying by cos(x)/cos(x) to facilitate the simplification. This leads to the expression (sin x + tan x)(cos x) / (1 + cos x)(cos x), which simplifies to (sin x * cos x + sin x) / (cos x * (1 + cos x)). Further steps are requested to complete the verification process.
dec1ble
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
im trying to verify this identity - sin x + tan x / 1 + cos x = tan x - i get lost very easily and need the steps - can anyone help me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
multiply by cos(x)/cos(x)
 
hmm - can you simplify any of it for me in steps?
 
\frac{sin x + tan x}{1+cos x}

\frac{(sin x + tan x)(cos x)}{(1+cos x) (cos x)}

\frac{sin x \cdot cos x + sin x}{cos x (1+cos x)}

can you take it from here?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top