Trig Integral Question: Solving \intsin32x dx | Tips & Tricks for Calculus

  • Thread starter Thread starter AzMaphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Trig
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of the function \(\int \sin^3(2x) \, dx\), with participants exploring various methods of integration, particularly focusing on u-substitution and integration by parts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of u-substitution and integration by parts, with one member questioning whether their approach or the book's answer is correct. There is also mention of splitting the integral into separate parts as a potential method.

Discussion Status

Some participants have verified the calculations and found consistency in their results, suggesting that the original poster's work is correct. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the validity of the book's answer, with no explicit consensus reached on the matter.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the chapter focused on u-substitution, which influenced their approach, and there is uncertainty about the correctness of the book's answer based on previous experiences with it.

AzMaphysics
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[tex]\int[/tex]sin32x dx

2. The attempt at a solution

[tex]\int[/tex]sin32x dx =
[tex]\int[/tex](1-cos22x)sin2x dx =
(-1/2)[tex]\int[/tex](1-cos22x)-2sin2x dx =
(-1/2)[tex]\int[/tex](1-u2)du where u= cos2x
(-1/2)(u-(u3/3)) =
(-cos 2x/2)+(cos32x/6) + C

Book says (cos3x/3)-(cosx/2) + C
Where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you have the right idea, but you should split the integral into two separate integrals after this step:
[itex]\int (1-cos^22x)sin2x dx[/itex]
 
Yea integrating by parts seems to be the preferred way to attack these types of problems. The chapter was focusing on u-substitution though so I tried going with that. I just can't tell if I made a mistake or if the book did (there's been a couple times in the past) or if the book's answer is just more simplified and I'm not seeing how.
 
Well I actually checked your work instead of assuming you made a mistake, and you made no mistakes (I got the same thing). The way to do this is definitely a u-substitution and you don't want to split it up as mentioned. Your answer is correct.

To save work, I also computed the derivative of our answer with Maple and it gave me the integrand that we started with. I did the same for the book's "answer", and it did not. So it looks like the book is incorrect on this one.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K