Trig Proofs: Websites for Basic Identities

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Trig
AI Thread Summary
Several users are seeking websites that provide proofs for basic trigonometric identities, including sin(x+y), cos(x+y), and sin(2x). The discussion highlights the use of the Euler formula to derive additive formulas and other identities, emphasizing the importance of defining sine and cosine correctly. It mentions that identities like tan²x + 1 = sec²x can be easily proven using the Pythagorean identity. Different definitions of sine and cosine lead to various methods for proving these identities, including using differential equations. The conversation underscores the need for clear definitions in understanding and proving trigonometric identities.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Does someone know of a website that has proofs for most basic trigonometry identities?

for sin(x+y), cos(x+y), sin(2x), cos(2x), tg²x + 1 = sec²x, etc


thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can use the Euler formula:
cos(x) + isin(x) = e^(ix)
So:
cos(x+y) + isin(x+y) = e^[i(x+y)]
cos(x+y) + isin(x+y) = e^(ix+iy)
cos(x+y) + isin(x+y) = e^ix * e^iy
Turn the right side into sines and cosines using the original formula and see what you get.

This way you can prove the additive formulas, and the other identities like sin(2x) or cos(x)+cos(y) or tg(x+y) can be proven using them. I don't know about the last one you mentioned since I have no idea what sec(x) is.
 
sec(x) is 1/cos(x). The last identity follows very easily from the Pythagorean identity, sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1.
 
quasar987 said:
Does someone know of a website that has proofs for most basic trigonometry identities?

for sin(x+y), cos(x+y), sin(2x), cos(2x), tg²x + 1 = sec²x, etc


thanks!

That depends strongly on how you define sine and cosine.

If you define them by the "elementary" right triangle ratios, sin2x+ cos2x= 1 follows from the Pythagorean theorem and tan2 x+ 1= sec2 x follows from that. However, such things as sin(x+y), cos(x+y) etc. may not even make sense.

If you define them by sin(x)= (eix- e-ix)/(2i) and cos(x)= (eix+eix)/2, then pig's method can be used.

If you define them by "sin(x) is the function, y, satisfying y"= -y, y(0)= 0, y'(0)= 1" and "cos(x) is the function, y, satisfying y"= -y, y(0)= 1, y'(0)= 0"
Then you can show that any function satisfying y"= -y, y(0)= a, y'(0)= b must be y= a cos(x)+ b sin(x). In particular, for example, cos(x+a) satisfies
y"= -y, y(0)= cos(a), y'(0)= -sin(a) so cos(x+a)= cos(a)cos(x)- sin(a)sin(x) and, with x= b, cos(a+b)= cos(a)cos(b)- sin(a)sin(b).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top