Solving Trig Related Physics Problem: Step by Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter rockytriton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving trigonometric functions. The user is confused about the transition from one equation to another in the solution process. They understand the initial equation but struggle with how to manipulate it to reach the next step. A key suggestion is to raise both sides of the equation to the second power, which helps clarify the transformation. This method is essential for simplifying the trigonometric expressions involved in the physics problem.
rockytriton
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to solve a physics problem with some trig in it. I'm looking at a solution but I'm not understanding where it gets from one step to another.

I understand it up to this point:

19.6m + 800m * cos(Z)^2 = 2,000m * sqr(1 - cos(Z)^2) * cos(Z)

But I don't understand how they get from that to:

384m^2 + 31,360m^2 * cos(Z)^2 + 640,000m^2 * cos(Z)^4 =
4,000,000m^2 * cos(Z)^2 - 4,000,000m^2 * cos(Z)^4

Is this some kind of crazy trig trick that I don't know about?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
rockytriton said:
I'm trying to solve a physics problem with some trig in it. I'm looking at a solution but I'm not understanding where it gets from one step to another.

I understand it up to this point:

19.6m + 800m * cos(Z)^2 = 2,000m * sqr(1 - cos(Z)^2) * cos(Z)

But I don't understand how they get from that to:

384m^2 + 31,360m^2 * cos(Z)^2 + 640,000m^2 * cos(Z)^4 =
4,000,000m^2 * cos(Z)^2 - 4,000,000m^2 * cos(Z)^4

Is this some kind of crazy trig trick that I don't know about?


Raise both sides of the equation to the second power and here you are (approximately, should have been 384.16m^2).
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top