Trigonmetric Integration Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter calcnd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
calcnd
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new to this forum. I figure it would be appropriate to briefly introduce myself before asking my question.

My name is Nick. I've graduated high school and I am presently taking the year off before attending university next fall. Having a lot of free time has allowed me to begin learning Calculus II topics that I'll inevitably encounter in the future.

Anyways, on to my question(s):

[tex]\int {{-1}\over{cos^2(x)}} dx[/tex]
[tex]= -\int {{sin^2(x) + cos^2(x)}\over{cos^2(x)}} dx[/tex]
[tex]= -\int {{sin^2(x)}\over{cos^2(x)}} dx -\int {{cos^2(x)}\over{cos^2(x)}}dx[/tex]
[tex]= -\int tan^2(x) dx - \int dx[/tex]
[tex]= ?[/tex]

Alas, I do not know how to properly integrate [tex]tan^2(x)[/tex]

I am relatively confident, however, that my above reasoning is corect. This is because the answer to the following integral is supposed to be:

[tex]\int tan^2(x)dx = tan(x) - x + C[/tex] Meaning:

[tex]\int {{-1}\over{cos^2(x)}} dx[/tex]
[tex]= -\int tan^2(x) dx - \int dx[/tex]
[tex]= -tan(x) + x - C - x + D[/tex]
[tex]= -tan(x) + K[/tex]


Which should be the correct answer. Thus, my problem is in integrating the tangent x squared function.Thank-you in advance,

Nick

Edit: It appears this forum uses a different tex protocol than what I am used to on another forum I frequent. I'm attempting to figure this out, but I do appologize for the confusing mess above.

Edit 2: I believe I found the culprit. The textit code does not apply on this forum. :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\int \tan^{2}x dx= \int \sec^{2}x-1\ dx = \tan x - x + C[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Ugh... now don't I feel rather stupid.

Trigonmetric identities will be the death of me.
 
courtrigrad said:
[tex]\int \tan^{2}x dx= \int \sec^{2}x-1\ dx = \tan x - x + C[/tex]

Yeah but [tex]\int \sec^2x dx[/tex] is precisely what he's trying to integrate. The question is, how can it be seen that tanx is a primitive of sec²x?
 
Yep,

I knew [tex]{d\over{dx}} tanx = sec^2x[/tex]. :)