Trigonometric Orthogonality Query

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of trigonometric orthogonality in the context of Fourier Series, specifically examining the integral of the product of cosine functions over a specified interval. Participants explore the conditions under which the orthogonality relation holds and the implications of non-integer values for the parameters involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the orthogonality condition for cosine functions, particularly questioning the integral result when the parameters m and n are close but not equal.
  • Another participant provides a proof for the orthogonality relation, although the details are not included in the thread.
  • A participant shares a visual representation of the area under the curve for different values of m and n, asserting that the area equals zero when m and n are integers.
  • One participant suggests a potential misunderstanding related to the notation used in the waveform, indicating that a specific input format may lead to incorrect interpretations.
  • Another participant counters that the software produces the expected waveforms but notes a discrepancy with the mathematical expectation of the integral equaling zero.
  • It is mentioned that the integral converges to zero only when evaluated over integer multiples of π, and that non-integer values for m and n disrupt the orthogonality condition.
  • Participants agree that both m and n must be integers for the orthogonality condition to hold, emphasizing that not just the values but their integer nature is crucial.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that m and n must be integers for the orthogonality condition to apply. However, there is disagreement regarding the implications of non-integer values and the interpretation of the integral results.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the behavior of the integral for non-integer values and the conditions under which the orthogonality relation is valid. The discussion highlights the dependence on definitions and the specific mathematical context.

Emphacy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I've wandered PF a few times in the past but never thought I'd join, here I am, how exciting.

To keep it short I'm trying to understand the proof behind Fourier Series and can't quite get to grips with basic trigonometric orthogonality.
I understand that sin and cos are naturally orthogonal but I'm having difficulty understanding this:

<br /> \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\cos(mx)\cos(nx)\, dx=\pi\delta_{mn} \,\,\,where\,\delta_{mn}=\begin{cases} <br /> &amp;\text{1 if } m=n \\ <br /> &amp;\text{0 if } m\neq n <br /> \end{cases}<br />

It makes sense that the area is \pi if m=n because you get this waveform and zero if m is an integer multiple of n because you get this waveform (here the negative areas cancel the positive areas from -\pi to \pi)

BUT... If m\neq n AND is sufficiently close e.g (m=2, n=2.1) you get this waveform, in which case the area from -\pi to \pi is clearly not zero.

What gives? Does this only apply if m and n are different by integer multiples?
Thanks for your time! (:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For both m,n ∈ ℕ, we have the following proof for this orthogonality relation:

Edit : posted it as an attachment because it wouldn't work otherwise.
 

Attachments

  • png-1.latex.png
    png-1.latex.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 494
Last edited:
This a plot visualization of the area when m and n are different, from -π to π. In this case, n=2 and m=3.

Can you see the area is equal to 0?
 

Attachments

  • WolframAlpha--integral_cos_2x__cos_3x__from__pi_to_pi__Visual_representation_of_the_integral__20.gif
    WolframAlpha--integral_cos_2x__cos_3x__from__pi_to_pi__Visual_representation_of_the_integral__20.gif
    3.7 KB · Views: 514
I just realized what you did wrong...

Your waveform has (2.1x) and not (2,1x) in the second cosine.

Try changing 2.1x to 2,1x.

Many computing softwares read the input 2.1 as 2*1.

With 2,1x, you'll get the expected result. ;)
 
The software produces the correct waveforms, it actually glitches when using commas (try cos(2,0x)).
The waveform is what I expected, but it just doesn't match up with the mathematics which states it should equal zero.

It only equals zero if you take the limit from -\infty to \infty
 
The integral does not converge if you take the limit from -∞ to ∞. It only converges (to 0) from -nπ to +nπ where n is an integer. The attached visual representation of the integral in my earlier post shows how the area is equal to 0.
 
Last edited:
Yes, m and n must both be integers. Otherwise, as you pointed out, the two functions are not orthogonal. So, not only must m and n but integer differences of each other, they must both be integers.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K