Trigonometry find the opposite side

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pin Head
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry
AI Thread Summary
To find the length of the opposite side in a right triangle when the length of the adjacent side and the angle are known, the correct formula is O = A * tan(θ), where O is the opposite side, A is the adjacent side, and θ is the angle. The initial misunderstanding involved incorrectly stating that opposite = tan degree / adjacent. The discussion clarified that using the tangent function requires multiplying the adjacent side by the tangent of the angle to find the opposite side. Additionally, the relationship between the sides can be rearranged to find the adjacent side if the opposite side is known. Understanding the SOH-CAH-TOA mnemonic is essential for applying these trigonometric principles correctly.
Pin Head
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm a bit curious on how do I find the length of the Opposite side of a Right Triangle,
now I have look a Soh Cah Toa, Now say if I know the length of the Adjacent Line and the the angle of the right triangle which formula should I use?

I thought about Toa is this the way I solve for the opposite?

opposite = tan degree / adjacent
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you understand what the mnemonic SOH-CAH-TOA means?

In response to your question, it's NOT true that "opposite = tan degree / adjacent". The correct formula is tan(##\theta##) = oppposite/adjacent, where ##\theta## is the acute angle you're looking at, opposite is the side opposite to ##\theta##, and adjacent is the side that is between ##\theta## and the right angle.
 
Yes I understand Soh Cah Toa but I am using the equation to find the side of an unknown
side and the formula I'm using is
Example

tan = opposite / adjacent
but I only have the opposite side and the angle so to find the adjacent side I used this formula

24 / tan 42 degrees = 26.654700355900628883443567139963

adjacent side = 26.654700355900628883443567139963

But now the side I want to find is the Opposite side, do I used the same equation but put the angle tan degree in the Opposite side and divide by the adjacent side to find the Opposite side

tan degree / adjacent = Opposite side ?

opposite = ?
 
Hi,
Sorry my mistake The formula I should of used is

adjacent * tan = opposite

example

12 * tan24 = 5.342744223702433967068404367748
 
Pin Head said:
Yes I understand Soh Cah Toa but I am using the equation to find the side of an unknown
side and the formula I'm using is
Example

tan = opposite / adjacent
but I only have the opposite side and the angle so to find the adjacent side I used this formula

24 / tan 42 degrees = 26.654700355900628883443567139963

adjacent side = 26.654700355900628883443567139963

But now the side I want to find is the Opposite side, do I used the same equation but put the angle tan degree in the Opposite side and divide by the adjacent side to find the Opposite side

tan degree / adjacent = Opposite side ?

opposite = ?

It's pretty simple algebra. The basic formula is
tan(θ) = O/A ... (1)

If you know the angle, θ, and the adjacent side A, and you want to find the opposite side O, multiply both sides of the equation above by A.
This gives you O = A*tan(θ)

If you know the angle and the opposite side O, and you want the adjacent side, A, multiply both sides of equation 1 by A, and then divide both sides by tan(θ).

tan(θ) = O/A
A*tan(θ) = O
A = O/tan(θ)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top